Free Energy Generator – The Pinwheel Gravity Engine

A gravity engine is a free energy generator that apparently harnesses the power of gravity and use it to make mechanical work.

Although they are very controversial, some say they made functional ones.

Pinwheels and Gravity

Pinwheels have been used for many things along history. One of the most interesting uses I’ve ever seen is making a pinwheel act as a free energy generator, powered by gravity.

The inventor of this (unknown) or some other free energy fan has posted an explanation of how the Pinwheel Free Energy Generator might work, on a Squidoo lens. Another website I found hosted the schematics that may help one build the generator. I compiled both and put them into this article.

I really don’t guarantee whether this free energy generator will work or not, but I’m eager to find anybody who tried it and their results. Gravity is one of the disputed possible sources of energy that, if harvested properly and if working, would change the way we see things – forever.

How the Pinwheel Gravity Engine Works

“As the weight ball in the lower cylinder descends, it forces the liquid out of the cylinder, through the Pelton wheel (turning the wheel and the generator), and into the upper cylinder. As the ball nears the bottom of the cylinder, the liquid weight of the mechanism is concentrated in the upper and right side cylinders, over-balancing the mechanism to rotate to the right when unlocked.

As the ball presses down on the unlocking mechanism of the gravitational engine, it also compresses the push bar spring. If the ball weighs 60,000 lbs, the energy in the spring can equal 59,999 lbs. Once the ball unlocks the mechanism, the spring bar pushes the lower cylinder out of the stop block. This push, along with the over-balance, causes the whole mechanism to rotate 90 degrees to where the right side cylinder becomes the lower cylinder, having now its ball begin its descent-producing electricity.

This process continues perpetually. An air venting pipe connects the cylinders that are opposite to each other so that as the liquid enters the top cylinder, the air it is displacing goes out the pipe and into the bottom cylinder, being assisted by the vacuum being created in the bottom cylinder by it’s ball descending.

This free energy generator can function because the laws of entropy prevent only singular mechanisms from performing perpetually because they need to use the energy they produce to recycle themselves. Being a compound mechanism, this generator does not. The energy is generated, gravity rotates it.”

If any of you tried this experiment and it did or did not work, please comment. Also, if you have an opinion after seeing the schematics presented below, say your thoughts.

pinwheel generator

comment subscribe

Check these out, too


These guys like us. Do you?


  • Sm0ky2

    The laws of physics must be strictly adhered to to prevent economic instability. We’re we to go around producing “free stuff”, life as we know it would cease to exist.

  • Shubham

    The moment someone claims that WE WILL HAVE PERPETUAL ENERGY BY PERPETUAL MOTION I simply read the rest with a pinch of salt. That is because under the laws of physics Energy (Input) == Energy (output) under ideal circumstances and Energy (input) > Energy (Output) under practical circumstances which asper free energy machines Energy (input =0) < Energy (output) which is clearly impossible may what anyone says. Theoretically many things can be said and many designs can be drawn but in practical there cannot be one claim which says SEE I HAVE MADE A FREE ENERGY DEVICE. If that was to happen the person will get a special Nobel Prize Overnight.

    • Cindy Coker

      Says someone who has probably never put his money where his mouth is. And also someone who actually believes science is absolutely correct in everything they claim and there’s nothing new to be learned. Not to mention that there’s absolutely ways to overcome certain so called “laws” in science, or a device may not actually be violating any of those laws at all once you truly understand how it works. As for perpetual motion devices and the never ending controversy…if a device runs for say 3 years before anything has to be done to it, I would call that a great invention. But there’s always too many armchair “experts” who shoot it down before it ever had a chance by calling it a perpetual motion scam that’s impossible. We are going to overcome the brainwashed sciences that stopped exploring and pushing the boundaries like their forebears long ago. That was back when they saw theories as theories that could be wrong or partially wrong and not chiseled in stone facts that could not be touched! Thank God we had real scientists who’s research gave us power generation in the first place because the people we have now would never be able to achieve it. They’re too concerned about peer criticism and getting papers published instead of testing ideas that might challenge the status quo! But we do still have people dedicated to learning and discovery. They will get the last laugh. Then the experts in their own mind only will claim that they knew it all along.

      • shubham chakraborty

        I will only say that all the best with your invention. I will be eagerly waiting for your invention to overturn the most fundamental laws of physics. Once you have done that and proven to the entire world that perpetual motion is possible I will stop calling myself a physics person and will never teach physics again. But before that kindly overcome the loss of energy due to inertia…. friction… traction…. air drag…. and a few more and then draw energy put of it without the system slowing down and without any type of energy input.
        By the way there were a group of people not so distant in past who believed in alchemy. Well the rest as they say is history.

        • Cindy Coker

          I didn’t say that perpetual motion was possible. But I believe that overunity is going to be achieved and I’m glad we have people who aren’t afraid of going against the establishment and the teachers of physics who were taught one way, never questioned anything and now teach one way and ridicule anyone else who questions anything. Do you honestly believe that science is 100% correct about all of the “laws” of physics? Do you think we can never discovery a way to get more energy out than we put in under any circumstances? Are we stuck with burning something as fuel, solar, wind, and hydro? I do not believe that! Do you? I know that a better way will be found. Obviously not by you….but it will be found. It probably already has but was rejected by our wonderful patent office because they couldn’t understand how it works! Nevermind THAT it works!

  • Amanda Mowers

    What if it was a U-shaped tube that used the pressure created by gravity alone? Is it possible, or has it even been accomplished, to have a free floating structure in the ocean, below the turbulent surface, that gathered water into a U-shaped tube and gathered the kinetic energy and then turned it into a power source, most likely electricity?

  • Edward Green

    Why not forget about the balls! You could simply replace the action of the ball sinking through the fluid and displacing it, with a cam on the axle and a couple of pistons! And, of course, it still wouldn’t work.

  • Prashant Badoni

    i just want to know how efficient the swingarms and a wheel mechanism with variable torque is?? because I’m working on it …please help me out..

    • Ateeq Ur Rehman

      Aslam o alaikum brother if you want a free energy genrator i have plan a gravity engine which is working on the principle of energy conservation

  • justathought

    @Geert Van Oosterwyck If citizens would be willing to release digestive gasses into a pet bottle and promptly enclose it by tightening the cap.  We can use these gases to power cars, electric appliances, and if enough bottles are collected the possibilities are without end.  In fact the slogan could be, “Energy from one end, to no end…”

    • Matei Stefan

      Damn!, that’s so f*cking funny, hahahaha. It’s been a long time since I’ve laughed so hard reading a comment. Thanks!

  • alibinsayed

    @Malkana  hi from qatar…we are researching into renewable sources of energy ,infact i designed a gravtational motor for a car,but it lacks a few desin integration.i would like to be in touch with you and if we cud speak ,i have a financed research dept. from a sheikh…pls email me back on [email protected] me skype on  cool7275..thx Ali.

  • PiE

    any unit larger than 100 KG would stall on the flip .. your science is lacking the 3rd axis of travel and the variable forces that make gravity . harvest the radiation that comes from the core of the earth .. think ark of the covenant … it is truly a wild card device .

  • joermidd
  • Michael Sterling

    Get $14000. Read Gravity books quickly. Research unlimited dark energy. Secure an Alien Network, then bounce over to Serbia in a Sterling hybrid water car, and build a Pinwheel.

    • eliasaoun

      @Michael Sterling did not understand your message. Can you sell a finished working engine that runs on free energy?

  • Aman

    @Malana,can you send me more details on basic working principle of the gravity powered engine you use.
    My email address is [email protected]

    Thanks a lot,
    I have putted my research into more proper format:
    Here are the new related webpages: (Presently three blog articles in one blog)

    Real Gravity engines or gravity wheels(most famous type of Gravity engine) works on the principle that,

    “95 percent working Gravity engines work on the principle that the Gravity engine/Gravity wheel systems are innovatively designed to take in (consume) much more Gravitational energy than what energy needed to lift heavy ball upward.”

    The most problematic thing with many people is they do not think how more amount of gravity can be inputted to gravity powered engine ,than that needed to take ball up.

    If you substract total amplified Gravitational energy input from the energy needed to lift heavy balls up in a gravity wheel,you get some net gravitational energy which is the net energy input to the system(input after subtraction) which can be converted to electrical energy.This is the scientific basis for any real Gravity engine.And hence real Gravity engines do not violate Laws of energy conservation and hence Gravity engines are Not Perpetual.
    Mystery solved.More details are available on the above mentioned webpages links.
    For me Gravity engines was never a mystery.

  • Richard E Arndt

    This is what i needed to kick start an idea i had thank you i will let u guys know if it works and the how i built it.

  • Malkana

    Hi Its not simple but in fact it work as i am using g-engine with my 55kv alternator to produce enough power for my use since 1986. I did not tried to market it as i knew i cant face the oil mafia but its running with me for long time i am taking 16000rpm at out put and then to control i am using reduction gear . i can not take chances but if any one of you out there have guts pls cont me so that we may do some thing. I am using on mountain to pump up water and general house and farming use of power i do have governt provided but mainly i am using my own power. I am using chines alternator . If we build it fix type and the couple it with big alternator to gain powr in mega is not at all problem but what to do world is being dominated by mafia and my country is already being rule by mafia????????? Now I am old enough i can take chances. Thanks

  • Aman

    Thanks,Oren,I am still continuing my research work,we want to make a perfect Gravity engine,more compact and more efficient.The research will not stop.

  • Oren Roosa

    The right way to get things done is not to mind who has got the credit for doing them.
    Don’t just retire from something; have something to retire to.

  • Aman

    I am 75 percent sure,that this gravity powered generator works on the principle I used!
    I am Aman. Perpetual motion machines are impossible. I am inventing an engine that runs on gravity for small domestic use and also optimising it for next world future cars. But my engine is not a perpetual motion machine!
    This is “gravity-piston impulse kinetic power technology.” It’s like releasing a heavy ball over a small, lightweight ball at some distance from the earth’s surface in a vacuum. This means, without any considerable reduction of speed of the bigger ball travelling towards the ground, the smaller balls get extra energy due to gravitational amplification. Well, my engine works on a similar principle. In other words, it works on the principle of gravitational amplification.
    What happens is very similar to this equation: “Impulsive gravitational energy absorbed and used by lightweight small ball from the heavy ball due to gravitational amplification plus standard gravity (9.8); as output electricity (converted) equals small loss of big ball due to impulse resistance/back reactance plus energy equivalent to go against standard gravity plus fictional energy loss plus impulsive energy applied.” I can’t disclose the whole concept to general public because we want to apply for a patent. There are a few diagrams relating to my idea, but I fear someone would copy them. Please wait until I get patent so that I can disclose my engine’s whole concept.
    At first, I intended to produce products only for domestic use and as a camping accessory. I am doing more research for increasing power output so that it can be used in the future in cars. My engine uses heavy weight piston gears, and four flywheels in an unconventional and different way and pusher rods, but not balls. It was necessary for me to use the example of balls to explain the basic idea I used in my concept. (The ball system is analogous to the piston-gear system I am using in my engine).
    I want to release one more secret of why might non Perpectual magnetic engines get power from magnets,continuously,
    Magnetic engines? Yes, possible but they are not perpetual.
    Photons (light) hit the atomic particles continuously to compress particles inside atoms and thus store energy in them similar to a compression spring in the form of nuclear energy!So you can extract that energy to get required electrical power!
    So non-perpetual magnetic engines are possible, but some people can cheat by claiming to invent perpetual machines.
    Well,I mean to say,”Analogous “,which means similar.Both his and mine may use similar basic principle /idea but the working mechanism may be totally different!

  • lightend

    I have a question.

    could you not use the generator (the thing that actually harnesses the energy and turns it into power), hold on, could you not mount the wheel on the generator and thus remove some of the extra friction that would be made when putting the wheel on the stand?

    also how much energy have you calculated a version of this would create? if it would be 50 watts per 3 foot wheel, then its not to great, but if it was to be closer to 1kw per 3 foot wheel, then you could sell a box with 10 wheels in each.

    i would be interested in attempting to make a small version of this (using a wheel roughly 3 foot in diameter) but i would need some more complex designs (im not entirely sure how the base would work, where the water would be, the air pipes ect ect.

    as for it eventually running out of steam, if it was creating enough power, you could have a small motor on a timer to reset it to maximum force again (auto engage and disengage after 30 seconds or whatever, and then sit dormant until the next time it was required)

  • chris

    i have just read this page and i believe it would work but i also believe that it will not rotate fast enough to produce a significant amount of electricity. it is a very good idea but will not fulfil the future’s energy needs.

  • Anand

    I might be missing something here. Please explain to me :
    1. By looking at the machine’s design, I feel it will oscillate rather than rotate (Note that the direction of the push bar is inverted)
    2. The concept of this machine running on gravity – Wont damping occur (Any amount of lubrication will not completely remove it) In a EM generator, magnetic force is much greater than the gravitational and inertial force. Here the driving force itself is gravity, unless the is complete absence of damping (impractical), how can it run the machine??

    Leme know if you have an explanation.


    [email protected]







    [email protected]

  • Geert Van Oosterwyck

    i’m busy to build my own system, on my own way how i think that we can build a working energyengine. But the first thing that i know is, that we must leave the idea of a wheel, a wheel is NOT working, never, try to build a working wheel are we still doing for centurys. If there was ONE who should work, we should use it for a lot of time.
    So, MY idea is: untill now, there is NO working device, otherwise, the world should know it, beceause a working free energyengine put the people off the whole world in the begin of a complete new time.
    I think that we gonna search it a lot to far of all, i think that we should just use simple mechanical laws to build a working machine. I have my own idea how i have to build it, but now…. the BIG question, suppose it works, what should i do with this engine???
    I can not take a patent, beceause “they” give NO patent for a “perpetuum mobile”beceause, “they” say that it is impossible. A couple hundred years ago “they” say that the earth was flat. “they” said that the earth was the middle of space. Galilei was in jail, bcz he said that the sun was the middle of our planetsystem, and NOT the earth. So, dont believe allways what “they” say. 120 years ago, “they” said that jules verne was a fantast, beceause we should travel to the moon.
    Changes in the history of mankind exist, just beceause there are people who not believe everything what “they” say. And these people try to find other ways ,and i know, we have a LOT of “fakers” , but, there are alose people who stay objective. I have my own idea how i have to build a working system, i”m busy to build a prototype now, just for the price of 100 euro. But i will just test my way of thinking, i will know off it works. Even my wife dont believe me ,just beceause “they” say that it is impossible. But i think that i have to try it, its just 100 euro, for this price, maybe i can change the world 🙂 The most important piece on my “engine” are… PETbottles, so i call my “project” :”the build of the pet bottle engine”. When it work, i let you know 😉

  • Theuns,
    I’m not sure you are understanding the operation of this machine.
    When the weight ball is at the bottom of the lower cylinder it has not loaded the top cylinder with more weight that itself. What moves the rotation is both the combined weight of the right side cylinder’s fluid, and the energy push received by the bottom push bar. These equal two times the energy for the rotation that the bottom ball represents to counter the rotation.
    With the left side ball having been pushed to the axis, and when the rotation begins the top weight contributing to the rotation, successful operation is achieved.
    Don’t forget to see the fluid weight in the right side cylinder.
    Thank you,
    Russell Lee

  • Hello,
    A design feature that has not been mentioned is that within the ball saddle is a spring mechanism (inverted automobile leaf spring would work) that is depressed when that cylinder is at the bottom position. As that cylinder rotates to the left after being emptied, the leaf spring (having a push bar) pushes the weight ball away from the saddle and toward the axis where magnetic attraction can hold the ball in place. This action removes the only weight resistance to the 90 degree rotation, insuring the generator’s operation.
    Thank you, Russell Lee

  • s.r.iyer

    i think the free energy in a combination of electromagnetism,gravity and solar electricity will provide for a perpetual energy mechanism,it will be a great idea to work on using all the three free resourses

  • Theuns

    I have calculated the required mass of the “Balls” for an assumed water level difference of 1m between the bottom and top water connecting pipe ends. With 1 metre height the pressure of the water at the bottom exit is calculated as density(water)*g(gravity constant)*1metre = 1000kg/m3*9.81*1= 9810pascal. Asumme now that the piston cross-sectional area is 1square metre, and the volume of water is 0.4cubic metre. The ball weight to push the piston down (with piston weight included) must be 1000kg to generate the 9810pascal. This ball will end up at the bottom of the piston (or close to it) and will thus balance any water that was raised to the top, ie it will not be top-heavy, at best with a perfect design it will stay balanced – with the current design with space open between the piston and the bal the assembly will be bottom-heavy after the ball has decended and be stable. Those who believe it will work, build it to prove it?

  • Jay

    I’m sorry but I think it is you that has missed the point of our discussion. Your statement that essentially all science is ridiculous is both ignorant and insulting. You wouldn’t be sitting there typing on a computer, communicating over the internet, in your nice heated/air conditioned home without science. Take a step back and take a bit more of your own advice before making such bold, unsubstantiated claims.

  • All this discussion is interesting but much of it is missing the point. This pinwheel generator represents the discovery that the laws of thermodynamics are circumventable. Compound mechanisms that, during their function, cease to exist and become something else are not held under these laws. This generator first is an energy generator with the weight ball descending down the bottom cylinder, then when the ball arrives at the bottom, the generator ceases to exist and the whole machine becomes an over-weighted wheel. Once the rotation is accomplished, this mechanism ceased to exist and the generation stage comes into existence.
    This is a perpetual mechanism, it’s just not built to be an eternity machine that can run forever due to the friction present. The mistake all common mortals make is that if a machine is demonstrating a perpetual motion effect, it must also, to be a perpetual motion machine, able to run forever. A perpetual motion machine does not have to be an eternity machine. Perpetual motion is how it runs, not how long it runs.
    Maybe some should re-read the explanation on the squidoo site one more time. With the addition of a past design improvement it cannot be argued that this machine will not work. The spring addition (potentially an automotive leaf spring) into the cradle holding the weight ball, when the rotation takes the bottom cylinder to the left side, the spring will cause the ball to travel toward the axis where it can be held in place by simple magnetic attraction to the axis cradle. This will eliminate most of the counter-weight opposing the rotation.
    Much of past science was ridiculous. Today’s science has come from the past. Tomorrow’s truths always find resistance in today’s/yesterday’s adherents. We cannot know any future truths if we view everything only through today’s lens. The message is simple: Think for yourself.

  • Thank you for your feedback on that. I appreciate your input there.

    As for Tesla, many of his inventions were not suppressed, but are in use
    today, such as alternating current, wireless transmission, and others.

    Many more of his inventions have patents but seem to be neglected.
    Maybe for good reason, I don’t know. Based on the obvious genius of
    the man, he appears to me to have been way ahead of his contemporaries,
    and might be even today if he was still alive.

    Here is an interesting site which outlines Tesla’s work, but perhaps
    unfinished would be a better word to describe some of it, rather than

    I do think that Big Oil interests actively suppress any technology that
    threatens their monopoly. If people had access to free energy, the oil
    companies would lose their economic control over everything energy

    I agree that an economy based on free energy would be much more prosperous
    for the world, but it is also about control, not just money. Power is the
    ultimate aphrodisiac, as they say.

    Anyway, not trying to argue. Thanks for an interesting discussion.

  • Jay

    “… but it seems that people like Tesla, who was clearly a genius, was able to use these principles for some amazing inventions, which were later suppressed by private interests. If you had a working prototype, do you really think those interests would allow you to build millions of them?”

    Firstly which ‘priciples’ are you referring to? And how do you know he had some amazing inventions that where suppressed? It makes zero sense that someone would suppress such a prototype – there would be SO much more money to make in free energy than all the hassle we go to dig up oil and coal.

    In short, the exert is conspiracy hogwash. It has the illusion of sounding plausible because it is interjected with some real history. For a start, Maxwell’s unedited “Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism” is available online, it was not thrown away and forgotten about. Hertz did play around with Maxwell’s equations attempting to add the effect of an ether – the existence of which was later disproved by the famous Michaelson and Morley experiment.

    It is true that Heaviside reformed the quaternion equations in terms of tensor fields, because they seemed more fundamental. What is left out here is that 100 years later physics RETURNED to these potentials as the fundamental object in Quantum Electrodynamics. These days QED is simply derived through the gauge principle – which is explicitly manifest only when you are working with the potentials.

    I can assure you there are not “22 errors” in the theory and they surely havent closed doors. Adding gravitation to electromagnetism was an interesting development of theory, done in the early 1900’s, but it ultimately ended up being wrong. The good thing about science is that dead ends are not taken too literally and the approach of adding extra dimensions to space to explain the forces of nature lives on – it is currently a thriving area of theoretical physics and an essential addition to string theory.

    I could go on about more problems with the excerpt, but its not really worth it, let me know if there is anything more in particular you want addressed.

  • I know that many (99.99%) devices do not work, but it seems that people like Tesla, who was clearly a genius, was able to use these principles for some amazing inventions, which were later suppressed by private interests. If you had a working prototype, do you really think those interests would allow you to build millions of them? You would be quickly bankrupted and discredited, or possibly worse. Such is the fate of people, like Dr. Rife, who cured cancer in the 1920s. Perhaps the politics that I refer to is what prevents these breakthroughs from reaching people like you to begin with. It is an external control system, not the scientist themselves. I don’t mean to label you one way or the other. I know that any community can be very diverse.

    I would be interested to get your reaction to the following excerpt. I’m not sure of the original source, but I have heard this more than once. There seems to be a divergence following Maxwell between what is taught in classical physics and what is available to covert interests. Maybe it is all nonsense and conspiracy theory. I don’t really know, but my sense is, there is some truth to it.

    “In late 1864, James Clerk Maxwell published his epic material on
    electromagnetic waves. His material dealt not only with electrical
    and magnetic waves, but also the relativistic/ etherial psycho-active
    component of these waves (representing electromagnetics of the second
    order and above). The equations also included transformations that
    enabled the change from inertial frames of reference to non-inertial
    frames of reference. Maxwell’s original equations were written in
    Quaternion notation, a complex mathematical system available at that
    time before Vector Analysis was introduced by Oliver Heaviside.
    Today’s generalized equivalent of Quaternions is Tensors.

    In short, Maxwell’s original work gave the necessary information for
    gravitational propulsion and psychoactive devices. Someone somewhere
    recognized this, for shortly after his death, the mathematician
    Oliver Heaviside, the chemist Willard Gibbs, and physicist Heinrich
    Hertz decided to “edit” or “interpret” Maxwells famous equations
    which were, in the original form, the foundations of electromagnetics
    and Unified Field Theory (UFT). This “unholy trio, especially
    Heaviside, disregarded the Quaternions or Scalar components of
    Maxwells original equations, because they represented potentials and
    not fields. He thought potentials were akin to “mysticism”,
    because “everybody knows that fields contain mass, and mass cannot be
    created from apparently nothing, which is what potentials are, both
    literally and mathematically; they are an accumulation or reservoir
    of energy. Furthermore, not only did they throw away the
    gravitational component with the Quatern- ion/Scalar, but also
    postulated that gravitation and electro- magnetism were mutually
    exclusive, not interdependent. That was the death blow to subsequent
    efforts by scientists to realize a functioning unified field theory.
    Because of this one act, electromagnetism was reduced from its
    original five dimensions to only four: X, Y, Z, and time. The element
    of G was removed.

    Because of this deliberate act, twenty-two other errors exist today
    in electromagnetic theory. The very concepts of force, mass and
    charge are ill-defined, and the so-called “static” electrical charge
    has been discovered by Quantum mechanics not to be static at all, but
    to move rotationally by virtue of the quantum mechanical spin.
    Finally, adding insult to injury, the so-called “imaginary
    components” of Maxwells original equations as well as the mutilated
    version of the equations have also been discarded or ignored. With
    this last error, the door to hyperspacial domains was forever closed,
    for the present mathematics and physics of electromagnetic theory do
    not allow for hyperspacial domains (domains out- side of three
    dimensions), superluminal signals (signals that exceed the speed of
    light or are infinite in speed), and a unified field theory.

    The edited version of Maxwells work, which every physicist and
    engineer has had to contend with, discards electrogravitation, and
    avoids the unification of gravitation and electromagnetics. It also
    prevents the direct engineering of gravitation, space-time, time flow
    rates, free energy devices, and quantum changes, which is viewed by
    the altered equations that are vector-based as only a statistical
    change. The quaternion approach captures the ability to utilize
    electromagnetics and produce local curvature of spacetime. Heaviside
    wrote a subset of Maxwell’s equations where this capability is

    Dr. Henry Monteith has independently discovered that Maxwell’s
    original quaternion theory was a unified field theory. Einstein
    assumed, because he only had access to the altered equations, that
    curving spacetime could only be achieved by the weak gravitational
    force due to mass, that the local frame would always be a Lorentz
    frame, which would mean that all operations would be constrained to
    conservation laws of physics.” In the 1960’s the Hertz (Hz) replaced
    Cycles Per Second. Since, then everyone thinks that all
    electromagnetic waves are hertzian. Only the upper portion of the
    spectrum before Infra- red contains Hertzian waves. ELF and ULF are
    not; waves in biosystems and natural phenomena are not Hertzian in

  • jay

    No problem. For one, if a device extracts energy from a known source then I wouldn’t call it an overunity device. You say we should examine why they work, but thats just it – they don’t work. Attempts to make devices such as this are not new, only more extravagant; the earliest designs date back to the 8th century! (

    But trust me, if someone produced a working prototype I would happily investigate it, find out how it works and build millions on them – this is just a very unlikely scenario. Also take it from someone on the inside, science is not governed by politics (at least where I’m from) we have a lot of freedom to explore the universe and our minds. Much to our frustration we are often labelled as closed-minded in these kinds of discussion, which really de-motivates us from taking part at all.

  • Sorry for my sarcasm. I was simply suggesting that no laws of physics
    are being broken by so called over unity devices. A dam could be thought
    of as over unity if we did not see the water or know where it came
    from and it might appear to violate physical laws. Magnetism, gravity,
    the zero point field, or whatever else might exist, can be tapped into as
    I’m sure there are more hoaxes than not, but it is hard to ignore the
    evidence of people like Tesla or Adams. Sometimes it just seems like
    the sciences are governed more by politics than a true desire for
    exploration and discovery.
    We should be examining why these alternate technologies work, not
    why they don’t. Just my humble opinion. 🙂

  • Jay

    …Because water does exist and gravitational potential energy is a well understood concept. The energy in the case of a dam is free as you say but by no means created from nothing. The sun provided the energy to evaporate the water (which then falls as rain) that we extract hydroelectricity from. There’s no magic going on here, the universe is a scrupulous accountant, if it weren’t devices such as those above would be solving the worlds problems by now.

  • Victor

    Ooh, ooh, I hear there is this new over unity device, called a hydroelectric dam. Where does the energy come from? Some say it is from the water in rivers storing up potential energy at the Dam wall, but I think that is just wishful thinking. How can you get free energy from a Dam? It defies the laws of physics. Won’t the friction in the Dam generators cause it not to work? I’ve never seen this so called “water”, therefore, it must not exist. How can a Dam tap into something that I say does not exist?
    Maybe I should get a PhD in physics too.

  • I think I would go for the Sun, Water and Wind to provide my “free energy”. This device could be a work of art as in a sculpture!

  • There is free energy, it’s caled Nature – Sun, Wind and Water and doesn’t look like it will stop for a while 🙂

  • jay

    Oh dear. Hear I was thinking I had found a good new site to visit..

    There is no such thing as a free lunch. You cant create energy from nothing – period. The world would not operate if this fundamental law (the conservation of energy) of physics was not upheld. I am not being closed minded about this, I am currently doing a PhD in physics.

    This device could run, as Mark said, perpetually if there was no internal friction. Even then, if there was no friction once you take energy out to power a generator, you slow the wheel down and it will stop.

  • reza sanatir.

    i think that can produce electricity by combination gravity and hydrolic for example inter the tube of a truck if you want to know mail to me.

  • Theresa Hartman

    What if you used a wind-power assist to provide just the tiniest bit of guarantee to the “perpetual motion,” thus allowing an outside small power source to keep this going? The wind power could get this going (if you have wind, which we have plenty of here in Texas) and keep it going through any slow-down of the friction-induced conditions. You might also consider a small assist from water flow, or even solar power, without tapping into the grid.

  • todd sloan

    Have built 2 gravity gen. 1 With Water, 1 with fishing weights. where can i send pic?

  • It seems now the website isn’t going to come up any time soon so it will found presently at the site (search in the way back machine bow).
    Russell Lee

  • Try this…I want someone to attached some tubes at angles (one end closer to the rim) all around the spoke area of a large bicycle wheel or a wheel with better bearings. Inside the tubes go solid steel or glass balls one in each. One end of the steel of hard plastic tube is sealed shut the other blocked with a small spring.

    The tubes are also internally lubricated. As the wheel turns the steel balls slide along the angled tubes to be closer to the wheels axil for half the rotation. as they pass at the top or the rotation, gravity pulls on them and they slide down the tube in the direction of the wheel rim untill they hit the solid tube end with a hard thud. The rool back before the ride back to the top is absorbed by the spring dampening and countering some momentum loss.

    Because the balls are closer to the rim on the down side and closer to the wheel centre during the ride back to the top, the wheel is always heaver on one side.

    This may not be enough to keep it turning due to the friction, so the momentum boost provided by the steel balls hitting the solid tube ends is like a small hammer that strengthens the momentum to keep the wheel turning, provided a human oils it once a week. I don’t have a workshop to build one.
    comments to Founder at

  • This design has been gaining a following and will no doubt show itself in an actual working machine in the near future. Because it has been given to all for free, every nation seeking energy self-sufficiency can take advantage of this free energy generator. Mark needs to study this design before deciding it won’t work. Believing automatically what the corporately controlled education system teaches is a great way to remain a stepford person. is to come up within a few days (3/14-16+-) so all can view ALL of the information on it and not have to take to smear attackers opinions on it.
    Thank you, Russell Lee
    Power to the People

  • muhammad awais

    if this posibal come in market but we not see in market why

  • Dirwynlyc

    There is a drawing of this machine posted at Look in the forum under gravity powered devices, pinwheel generator. It is on the 2nd page of this thread. It will give an idea of what this machine would look like if it were built. As far as I know, no one has built this machine yet.

  • Mark

    Just like in freshman physics, as long as you ignore friction, it works.
    The US patent office banned patent applications for “perpetual motion” machines more than a hundred years ago for a reason-they can’t work.