<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carbon dioxide emissions Archives &#8211; The Green Optimistic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/tag/carbon-dioxide-emissions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>green tech news, since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 20:21:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2667534</site>	<item>
		<title>Save by Using More Energy for Heating, Researchers Say</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/save-using-energy-heating-researchers-say-20160604/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/save-using-energy-heating-researchers-say-20160604/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Lepping]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 20:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Power Saving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bio-friendly constructions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal mass construction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=60036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There are ways to save money while using more energy to heat a building. The only condition: raise the heat during the nighttime. Aarhus University researchers created this environmentally-friendly, financially-winning system by using simulations and calculation models. Increasing the use of 10 percent more energy will save the same percentage on the heating bill. This [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/save-using-energy-heating-researchers-say-20160604/">Save by Using More Energy for Heating, Researchers Say</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/save-using-energy-heating-researchers-say-20160604/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">60036</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forest Burning is &#8220;Carbon Neutral,&#8221; Says US Senator</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forest-burning-carbon-neutral-us-senator-20160309/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forest-burning-carbon-neutral-us-senator-20160309/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mila Luleva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 18:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burning forest carbon neutral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Energy Modernization act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=59530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Burning forest wood is now considered carbon neutral, according to a shocking new amendment to the Energy Modernization act of 2015. Politicians have the power to make something legal or illegal in a matter of seconds. However, we all hope that when a new legislation is brought forward, the improvements it introduces are based on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forest-burning-carbon-neutral-us-senator-20160309/">Forest Burning is &#8220;Carbon Neutral,&#8221; Says US Senator</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forest-burning-carbon-neutral-us-senator-20160309/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">59530</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>$17 Trillion Could Be Saved by Reducing Fossil Fuel Emissions</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fossil-fuel-emissions-save-trillion/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fossil-fuel-emissions-save-trillion/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annika Tostengard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of fossil fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenest cities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=56577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>New Climate Economy has released a report finding that if cities cut their fossil fuel emissions, together they could save a grand total of $17 trillion by the year 2050. The report even indicates that $17tn is a low estimate, and that the true cost savings could be a lot higher. Cities need to concentrate on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fossil-fuel-emissions-save-trillion/">$17 Trillion Could Be Saved by Reducing Fossil Fuel Emissions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fossil-fuel-emissions-save-trillion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56577</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Environmental Impact of Our Connected Life</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environmental-impact-connected-life-20140905/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environmental-impact-connected-life-20140905/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable electronic devices]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=49132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever thought about the environmental impact of our adoption of modern technology, such as smartphones, tablets, or laptops? It has been said that the world is getting smaller and, in a sense, it is. Thanks to modern technology, we can now communicate, in real time, with people halfway around the globe. Internet-connected devices [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environmental-impact-connected-life-20140905/">The Environmental Impact of Our Connected Life</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environmental-impact-connected-life-20140905/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">49132</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heavy Metal – Nuclear Locomotives vs Diesel Locomotives</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/heavy-metal-nuclear-locomotives-vs-diesel-locomotives-20140428/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/heavy-metal-nuclear-locomotives-vs-diesel-locomotives-20140428/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel locomotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear locomotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PM2.5]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=47215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The other day, being particularly bored, I watched “Snowpiercer” online (Yes, I was that bored), and it reminded me of the thought of nuclear power in a locomotive application. According to the movie, – I’m certain that the anime and manga versions were better representations – Snowpiercer ran on some sort of “perpetual motion engine” [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/heavy-metal-nuclear-locomotives-vs-diesel-locomotives-20140428/">Heavy Metal – Nuclear Locomotives vs Diesel Locomotives</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/heavy-metal-nuclear-locomotives-vs-diesel-locomotives-20140428/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47215</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Various Energy Sources</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-various-energy-sources-20140416/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-various-energy-sources-20140416/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=47043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to climate change scientists, reduction of carbon dioxide emissions is an absolute necessity to address the source of the problem, if it isn’t too late to do anything about it. According to the EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) about one third of US carbon dioxide emissions are generated in industry and power production. Considering [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-various-energy-sources-20140416/">Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Various Energy Sources</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-various-energy-sources-20140416/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47043</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Producers Overestimate Emissions Control Costs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for American Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Air Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison Electric Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power production]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=46599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Carbon dioxide emissions are the latest focus of the EPA, including transportation and power production sectors. Power producers say it’s too heavy of a burden. We have the technology to address emissions, whether by reduction or elimination of fossil fuel burning, or by the addition of emissions-reduction technology. Mention this to most companies, however, and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/">Power Producers Overestimate Emissions Control Costs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46599</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Key to the California Carbon Problem: Tesla and Ivanpah</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/key-california-carbon-problem-tesla-ivanpah-20140304/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/key-california-carbon-problem-tesla-ivanpah-20140304/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ivanpah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tesla Motors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=46299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to recent research, California is actually the Nation&#8217;s second-biggest carbon dioxide emitter, and the biggest problem is the transportation sector. This might come as a surprise when you read about California&#8217;s implementation of renewable energy, such as the recent startup of the world&#8217;s largest concentrated solar power (CSP) plant in Ivanpah. In fact, by [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/key-california-carbon-problem-tesla-ivanpah-20140304/">The Key to the California Carbon Problem: Tesla and Ivanpah</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/key-california-carbon-problem-tesla-ivanpah-20140304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46299</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Three Biggest Carbon Dioxide Footprints Are Made By…</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=46288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Taking a look at the Nation&#8217;s biggest emitters of carbon dioxide, we can see that we have a long way to go sweeping up our footprints. According to the most recent data, it should really come as no surprise that the two most-populous States generate the most carbon dioxide, but the third might come as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/">And the Three Biggest Carbon Dioxide Footprints Are Made By…</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46288</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surburban Carbon Dioxide &#8220;Hurricanes&#8221; Surround Major Cities</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-hurricanes-surround-major-cities-20140109/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-hurricanes-surround-major-cities-20140109/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=45040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to research being done at the University of California at Berkeley, we can see, in a striking way, where the carbon dioxide emissions are generated, and cities aren&#8217;t the source. The laws of mass-production, those that predict a drop in production costs and selling prices as production increases, also seem to fit well with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-hurricanes-surround-major-cities-20140109/">Surburban Carbon Dioxide &#8220;Hurricanes&#8221; Surround Major Cities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-hurricanes-surround-major-cities-20140109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">45040</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Coal-Burning Plants Burn Wood to Reduce CO2 Emissions?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/can-coal-burning-plants-burn-wood-reduce-carbon-dioxide-emissions-20131104/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/can-coal-burning-plants-burn-wood-reduce-carbon-dioxide-emissions-20131104/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 06:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pointless Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backwards thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wood]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=43158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Coal-burning adds to carbon dioxide emissions at an astonishing rate, releasing carbon dioxide that was sequestered millions of years ago. Coal-burning also releases a lot of other problematic emissions, as is being seen today in coal-rich China, whose air is choked with smog and particulate emissions, ruining the skyline and residents&#8217; lungs. In order to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/can-coal-burning-plants-burn-wood-reduce-carbon-dioxide-emissions-20131104/">Can Coal-Burning Plants Burn Wood to Reduce CO2 Emissions?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/can-coal-burning-plants-burn-wood-reduce-carbon-dioxide-emissions-20131104/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43158</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adding Biochar To Soils Increases Their Fertility And Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/adding-biochar-soils-increases-fertility-reduces-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20131008/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/adding-biochar-soils-increases-fertility-reduces-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20131008/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mila Luleva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2013 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=42304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Scientists from University of Tubingen have discovered a way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural land. Microbiologists Johannes Harter and Jans-Martin Krause and team, explored whether adding biochar to the soil will allow farmers to reduce the amount of needed nitrogen fertilizer, and to cut down the emitted nitrous oxide. It turns out, it [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/adding-biochar-soils-increases-fertility-reduces-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20131008/">Adding Biochar To Soils Increases Their Fertility And Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/adding-biochar-soils-increases-fertility-reduces-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20131008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42304</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Food Waste Carbon Dioxide Emissions Equivalent to Three Billion Cars</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-food-waste-carbon-dioxide-emissions-equivalent-three-billion-cars-20130911/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-food-waste-carbon-dioxide-emissions-equivalent-three-billion-cars-20130911/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Saving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food waste]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=41527</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ask anyone about carbon dioxide emissions and, depending on their field of interest, they may respond with changes facing the automotive industry, or perhaps power generation, food waste might be somewhat of a rarer conversation piece. The next time you go to a restaurant and leave food on the plate or you see that your [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-food-waste-carbon-dioxide-emissions-equivalent-three-billion-cars-20130911/">Global Food Waste Carbon Dioxide Emissions Equivalent to Three Billion Cars</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-food-waste-carbon-dioxide-emissions-equivalent-three-billion-cars-20130911/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41527</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just How Green are the Tesla Model S and Other Electric Vehicles?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/just-how-green-is-the-tesla-model-s-and-other-electric-vehicles-20130605/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/just-how-green-is-the-tesla-model-s-and-other-electric-vehicles-20130605/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Car industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seeking Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tesla model s]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=38096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tesla Model S, as with all electric vehicles, has zero tailpipe emissions. We all know that, since there is no tailpipe, but what about emissions related to power production and battery manufacturing? On the other hand, there are other emissions that we readily admit electric vehicles as having, such as the carbon dioxide and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/just-how-green-is-the-tesla-model-s-and-other-electric-vehicles-20130605/">Just How Green are the Tesla Model S and Other Electric Vehicles?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/just-how-green-is-the-tesla-model-s-and-other-electric-vehicles-20130605/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">38096</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>See Which EU Automakers Fuzzy Carbon Dioxide Emissions Math</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/eu-automakers-carbon-dioxide-fake-20130531/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/eu-automakers-carbon-dioxide-fake-20130531/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 19:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Efficient engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bmw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=37902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Granted, carbon dioxide emissions and fuel economy measurements are hardly real-world, but it seems that some automakers have a little more tolerance built into their calculations than others. Carbon dioxide emissions standards have become more strict, essentially forcing automakers to produce vehicles with better fuel economy. Over time these standards will continue to strengthen, which [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/eu-automakers-carbon-dioxide-fake-20130531/">See Which EU Automakers Fuzzy Carbon Dioxide Emissions Math</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/eu-automakers-carbon-dioxide-fake-20130531/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">37902</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Higher Carbon Dioxide Emissions Associated With Older People</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-older-people-20130218/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-older-people-20130218/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mila Luleva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[older people co2 emissions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=33556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Older people have higher carbon dioxide emissions, says a Max Planck institute study. This means that even environmentally-conscious baby-boomers have higher emissions than younger generations. A striking study conducted back in 2011 by Emilio Zagheni , a demographer working at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, showed that as people get older, they become responsible [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-older-people-20130218/">Higher Carbon Dioxide Emissions Associated With Older People</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-dioxide-emissions-older-people-20130218/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">33556</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Continue to Rise, European Report Estimates</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-carbon-dioxide-emissions-continue-to-rise-european-report-estimates-20120720/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-carbon-dioxide-emissions-continue-to-rise-european-report-estimates-20120720/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maria Reyes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2 emissions rise]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=25586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Worldwide carbon dioxide emissions continue to rise amidst threats of global warming and climate change. Records show a 3% increase in global emissions in 2011, which translates to an all-time high of 34 billion tons of CO2 released in the atmosphere. These findings were taken from the annual report ‘Trends in global CO2 emissions’, which [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-carbon-dioxide-emissions-continue-to-rise-european-report-estimates-20120720/">Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions Continue to Rise, European Report Estimates</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/global-carbon-dioxide-emissions-continue-to-rise-european-report-estimates-20120720/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25586</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forests Do Better Job When Uncut Than Burned as Biofuels, Researchers Say</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forests-biofuel-duke-oregon-study-20120601/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forests-biofuel-duke-oregon-study-20120601/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oregon state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wood carbon storage]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=24804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>They say forests are Earth&#8217;s lungs &#8211; ok, but they&#8217;re after all biomass, and we could cut them for a profit and still stay clean, because this practice should be carbon neutral&#8230; not. At least that&#8217;s what common sense and two U.S. universities (Duke and Oregon State) are telling me. Because wood stores only about [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forests-biofuel-duke-oregon-study-20120601/">Forests Do Better Job When Uncut Than Burned as Biofuels, Researchers Say</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/forests-biofuel-duke-oregon-study-20120601/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24804</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spanish Housing Project Substantially Reduces Carbon Dioxide Emissions</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/actx-spain-carbon-dioxide-housing-project-20120524/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/actx-spain-carbon-dioxide-housing-project-20120524/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Contributor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actx spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=24714</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A sustainable housing project developed by architects at ACTX in Salburúa, Spain, is a remarkable masterpiece of modern architecture. This eco-friendly project is said to have a substantial reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and was completed in 2011. It was designed to integrate 9 shops at the ground level while all the other upper floors [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/actx-spain-carbon-dioxide-housing-project-20120524/">Spanish Housing Project Substantially Reduces Carbon Dioxide Emissions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/actx-spain-carbon-dioxide-housing-project-20120524/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24714</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report Suggests 2009 Financial Crisis Didn&#039;t Lower Pollution</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/financial-crisis-pollution-developing-countries-20111206/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/financial-crisis-pollution-developing-countries-20111206/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developing countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=21399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A paper published recently in Nature Climate Change reveals that the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) has not yielded a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions, as did the other crises, like the oil-related ones in 1973 and 1979. Instead, the emissions kept growing because of developing countries like China and India, on whom the crisis did [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/financial-crisis-pollution-developing-countries-20111206/">Report Suggests 2009 Financial Crisis Didn&#039;t Lower Pollution</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/financial-crisis-pollution-developing-countries-20111206/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21399</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accelerated In Recent Years Despite Economic Recession, Says WMO</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/wmo-report-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20101124/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/wmo-report-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20101124/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world meteorological organization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=11979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) released a press statement today, in which they warn about the rise in atmospheric greenhouse gases during the last few years. Despite the economic crisis, which slowed down the industry a bit, the gas concentration rose in 2009, driving Earth towards a sure warming in the near future.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/wmo-report-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20101124/">Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accelerated In Recent Years Despite Economic Recession, Says WMO</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/wmo-report-greenhouse-gas-emissions-20101124/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11979</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYU Professor Points Out Why Alternative Energy Production Doesn&#039;t Grow As Expected</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/martin-hoffert-global-warming-20100910/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/martin-hoffert-global-warming-20100910/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin hoffert]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=10202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There are scientists who are optimistic about the chances we have to heal the planet and reduce its warming, scientists who are definitely rejecting anything related to global warming, saying it doesn't exist, and scientists who are butt-kickers and telling the world what works and what doesn't. Martin Hoffert, from the University of New York, is one of the third kind, in my opinion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/martin-hoffert-global-warming-20100910/">NYU Professor Points Out Why Alternative Energy Production Doesn&#039;t Grow As Expected</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/martin-hoffert-global-warming-20100910/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10202</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Incredible Synthetic Tree for CO2 Sequestration</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/incredible-synthetic-tree-for-co2-sequestration-20090628/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/incredible-synthetic-tree-for-co2-sequestration-20090628/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cristi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2 capturing structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 Sorbent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collecting Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klaus Lackner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Chu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthetic Tree Concept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=3843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Columbia University has announced the development of a structure that could capture carbon 1,000 times faster than a real tree. Klaus Lackner said, as the "tree" could be used for capturing carbon which has been already emitted into the air by car gasoline or airplain fuel.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/incredible-synthetic-tree-for-co2-sequestration-20090628/">Incredible Synthetic Tree for CO2 Sequestration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/incredible-synthetic-tree-for-co2-sequestration-20090628/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3843</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Power Express Electricity Superhighway Project in Development</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-power-express-superhighway-20090626/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-power-express-superhighway-20090626/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cristi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Energy Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Energy Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Power Superhighway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resource Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Department Of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Harness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Resource Map]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=3783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In order to satisfy energy needs for people in the Upper Midwest of US, The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has approved a green energy project. The green power superhighway(around 3,000 miles) will deliver energy to consumers in and around Chicago, Minneapolis and other load centers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-power-express-superhighway-20090626/">Green Power Express Electricity Superhighway Project in Development</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-power-express-superhighway-20090626/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3783</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waterproof Solar Powered Cell Phone by KDDI and Sharp</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/waterproof-solar-powered-cell-phone-by-kddi-and-sharp-20090428/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/waterproof-solar-powered-cell-phone-by-kddi-and-sharp-20090428/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cristi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phone generator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDDI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar cell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar cell phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy usage]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=3440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The waterproof solar cell phone will be sold starting with June by Japan's No.2 wireless provider, KDDI Corp. The gadget had been developed by Sharp Corp and promises carbon dioxide reduction by 80% charging from sunlight.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/waterproof-solar-powered-cell-phone-by-kddi-and-sharp-20090428/">Waterproof Solar Powered Cell Phone by KDDI and Sharp</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/waterproof-solar-powered-cell-phone-by-kddi-and-sharp-20090428/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3440</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
