<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carbon sink Archives &#8211; The Green Optimistic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/tag/carbon-sink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>green tech news, since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:37:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2667534</site>	<item>
		<title>Biomass to Electricity &#8211; EPA Warned of Potential Issues</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=44100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The transformation of biomass to electricity was once considered a carbon neutral energy source. By allowing power plants to substitute natural fuel (biomass) in lieu of coal, they are able to avoid fossil-fuel carbon emissions. This has proven to be an egregiously misinformed strategy. With trees being half water by weight, they automatically come with less [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/">Biomass to Electricity &#8211; EPA Warned of Potential Issues</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44100</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ocean Plankton Digests More Carbon Than Thought</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/ocean-plankton-carbon-digest-20130318/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/ocean-plankton-carbon-digest-20130318/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mila Luleva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean plankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface ocean plankton]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=34986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Existing models of carbon dioxide do not accurately predict the amount of carbon digested by surface ocean plankton, says a study published in the latest issue of Nature Geoscience. Adam Martiny, associate professor of Earth system science and ecology &#38; evolutionary biology at UC Irvine and a lead author of the publication, and his team, showed that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/ocean-plankton-carbon-digest-20130318/">Ocean Plankton Digests More Carbon Than Thought</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/ocean-plankton-carbon-digest-20130318/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">34986</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capturing Carbon Dioxide From Air Would Be Inefficient, Princeton Study Says</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/direct-air-capture-20110509/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/direct-air-capture-20110509/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action on climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capture CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2 sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Air Capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Socolow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=18553</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The carbon dioxide that we emit can be reduced in several ways, out of which some are more or less effective. A study performed by Princeton engineer Robert Socolow reveals that as much as we'd want to, we simply can't remove carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by means of "Direct Air Capture" technologies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/direct-air-capture-20110509/">Capturing Carbon Dioxide From Air Would Be Inefficient, Princeton Study Says</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/direct-air-capture-20110509/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">18553</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
