<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>coal power plant Archives &#8211; The Green Optimistic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/tag/coal-power-plant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>green tech news, since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2667534</site>	<item>
		<title>Beijing Coal Power&#8217;s Last Breath will be in 2016</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-power-China-Beijing/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-power-China-Beijing/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 03:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas power plant]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=53911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been covering Beijing&#8217;s growing air pollution problem for some time now, as the city fights to decide between coal power and its growing energy needs. The problem with coal power is that it is easy, practically just laying there, ready to burn. It also happens to be one of the dirtiest fossil fuel sources [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-power-China-Beijing/">Beijing Coal Power&#8217;s Last Breath will be in 2016</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-power-China-Beijing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53911</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Three Biggest Carbon Dioxide Footprints Are Made By…</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2014 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=46288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Taking a look at the Nation&#8217;s biggest emitters of carbon dioxide, we can see that we have a long way to go sweeping up our footprints. According to the most recent data, it should really come as no surprise that the two most-populous States generate the most carbon dioxide, but the third might come as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/">And the Three Biggest Carbon Dioxide Footprints Are Made By…</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/three-biggest-carbon-dioxide-footprints-made-20140304/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46288</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>On-Plant Carbon Capture Much More Efficient Than Air Scrubbing, Study Says</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-capture-plant-efficiency-study-20111213/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-capture-plant-efficiency-study-20111213/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 12:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuel power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Wilcox]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=21486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To get rid of carbon dioxide from our atmosphere, one sure way to go would be capturing the gas directly from the air. However, this is more of a challenge than would be capturing the carbon at the source of its emission, the power plant furnaces, say Stanford and MIT researchers. A similar study has [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-capture-plant-efficiency-study-20111213/">On-Plant Carbon Capture Much More Efficient Than Air Scrubbing, Study Says</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/carbon-capture-plant-efficiency-study-20111213/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21486</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany Phases Out 8 Nuclear Plants Only to Rely On&#8230; Guess What!</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/germany-nuclear-plants-coal-renewables-20111109/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/germany-nuclear-plants-coal-renewables-20111109/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angela merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal fired power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal power plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany nuclear plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany nuclear power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Plant]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=21108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You knew Germany is set to shut all of its 18 nuclear power plants by 2022, didn&#8217;t you? I also knew that, but as Angela Merkel&#8217;s government ordered shutting eight of them this year, it now plans for a long and heavy winter, where the renewable energy resources Germany has are not enough to sustain [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/germany-nuclear-plants-coal-renewables-20111109/">Germany Phases Out 8 Nuclear Plants Only to Rely On&#8230; Guess What!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/germany-nuclear-plants-coal-renewables-20111109/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21108</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
