<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental Protection Agency Archives &#8211; The Green Optimistic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/tag/environmental-protection-agency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>green tech news, since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:51:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2667534</site>	<item>
		<title>Scott Pruitt Resigns From EPA, Mother Earth Continues Weeping</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/scott-pruitt-resign-epa-20180713/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/scott-pruitt-resign-epa-20180713/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Say]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott pruitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scott pruitt resignation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=65895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After President Trump accepted his resignation a few days ago, Scott Pruitt is no longer the head of the EPA. This looks a lot better than it really is, though it is vindicating to see Scott “I Destroy The Environment For Money” Pruitt exposed for the corrupt, wasteful, shill he has been shown to be. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/scott-pruitt-resign-epa-20180713/">Scott Pruitt Resigns From EPA, Mother Earth Continues Weeping</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/scott-pruitt-resign-epa-20180713/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">65895</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA: States Have Until 2022 to Comply With Pollution Regulations</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/epa-pollution-regulations-comply/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/epa-pollution-regulations-comply/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annika Tostengard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=56042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration previously proposed legislation including regulations written by the Environmental Protection Agency requiring pollution-emitters like power plants to begin dramatically cutting their emissions starting in the year 2020. The legislation still has not been finalized, and according to people involved in the planning, the EPA will extend the deadline until the year 2020. However, the environmental agency [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/epa-pollution-regulations-comply/">EPA: States Have Until 2022 to Comply With Pollution Regulations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/epa-pollution-regulations-comply/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56042</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lightweight Cars Will Drive Fuel Economy Future, say Carmakers</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/lightweight-cars-fuel-economy/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/lightweight-cars-fuel-economy/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 04:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Car industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Average Fuel Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightweight construction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=53696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Fuel economy in the automotive industry has been largely dependent on aerodynamics and powertrain enhancements, but lightweight cars are going to take us into the future. Since CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Economy) standards were first implemented by the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), back in 1978, the main means of reducing fuel consumption and emissions has [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/lightweight-cars-fuel-economy/">Lightweight Cars Will Drive Fuel Economy Future, say Carmakers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/lightweight-cars-fuel-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53696</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewable Energy is Reliable, Says Report</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/renewable-energy-reliable/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/renewable-energy-reliable/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum hydrogen storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brattle Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Power Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=53606</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We know that most forms of renewable energy are intermittent, which some have used as a scare tactic to keep people from investing, either emotionally or materially, in clean energy technology. It&#8217;s true, renewable energy, such as solar power, depends on sunshine, or hydroelectric power, depends on rainfall, so a new energy future could be [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/renewable-energy-reliable/">Renewable Energy is Reliable, Says Report</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/renewable-energy-reliable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53606</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europe Needs to Update Fuel Economy Test Cycles</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/europe-needs-update-fuel-economy-test-cycles-20141205/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/europe-needs-update-fuel-economy-test-cycles-20141205/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Car industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEDC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New European Drive Cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation & Environment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=50473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Times, “they are a-changin’ but, at least according to some independent testing agencies, environmental regulations, such as those that govern transportation fuel economy and carbon dioxide emissions, aren’t keeping up with them. Fuel economy measurements are a big part of marketing green cars. Recently, Toyota announced pricing on the Toyota Prius c, which has the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/europe-needs-update-fuel-economy-test-cycles-20141205/">Europe Needs to Update Fuel Economy Test Cycles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/europe-needs-update-fuel-economy-test-cycles-20141205/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">50473</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Oil Behind Blocking Use of Ethanol? Say It Isn’t So!</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/big-oil-behind-blocking-use-ethanol-say-isnt-20140714/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/big-oil-behind-blocking-use-ethanol-say-isnt-20140714/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Car industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Fuel Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Fuels Association]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=48511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), higher percentages of biofuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, are to be blended in the national fuel supply, but it seems that Big Oil might play a part in making it difficult. While fuel-efficient vehicles use less fuel overall, one might think this is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/big-oil-behind-blocking-use-ethanol-say-isnt-20140714/">Big Oil Behind Blocking Use of Ethanol? Say It Isn’t So!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/big-oil-behind-blocking-use-ethanol-say-isnt-20140714/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">48511</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Environment vs Economy Could be a Win-Win Situation</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environment-vs-economy-win-20140604/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environment-vs-economy-win-20140604/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions-reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=47836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Every time someone, whether it be scientists, the federal government, or environment activists, suggest that we need to cut emissions and reduce pollution, the other side of the argument is always, “but it’ll ruin the economy!” The short answer to that retort is, perhaps reflected best in the words of Elon Musk (regarding hydrogen fuel [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environment-vs-economy-win-20140604/">How Environment vs Economy Could be a Win-Win Situation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/environment-vs-economy-win-20140604/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47836</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Energy to Fund Zero-Emissions Cargo Transportation Technology</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/department-energy-fund-zero-emissions-cargo-transportation-technology-20140505/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/department-energy-fund-zero-emissions-cargo-transportation-technology-20140505/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 19:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydrogen Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel locomotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTR tractor trailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Emissions Cargo Transportation (ZECT)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=47330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>While zero-emissions transportation is still a fairly new field, zero-emissions cargo transportation is practically unheard-of. Cargo transportation, the backbone of which, at least in the United States, is the over-the-road (OTR) tractor trailer and the diesel locomotive, generates millions of metric tons of greenhouse gases. OTR tractor trailers, for example, generated ≈400 MMT (million metric [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/department-energy-fund-zero-emissions-cargo-transportation-technology-20140505/">Department of Energy to Fund Zero-Emissions Cargo Transportation Technology</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/department-energy-fund-zero-emissions-cargo-transportation-technology-20140505/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47330</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earth Day – How Big is Your Footprint?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/earth-day-big-footprint-20140421/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/earth-day-big-footprint-20140421/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 14:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earth day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Day Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[footprint]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=47085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow, April 22, 2014, marks the 44th Annual Earth Day, which started in 1970. Today, over a billion people participate in Earth Day activities around the world. This first Earth Day, back on April 22, 1970, could probably be credited with the modern environmental movement and the passage of such environmental legislation as the Clean [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/earth-day-big-footprint-20140421/">Earth Day – How Big is Your Footprint?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/earth-day-big-footprint-20140421/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47085</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Power Producers Overestimate Emissions Control Costs</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2014 00:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for American Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Air Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edison Electric Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power production]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=46599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Carbon dioxide emissions are the latest focus of the EPA, including transportation and power production sectors. Power producers say it’s too heavy of a burden. We have the technology to address emissions, whether by reduction or elimination of fossil fuel burning, or by the addition of emissions-reduction technology. Mention this to most companies, however, and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/">Power Producers Overestimate Emissions Control Costs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/power-producers-overestimate-emissions-control-costs-20140321/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">46599</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>States Urge Feds to Implement Stricter Nationwide Carbon Dioxide Limits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/states-urge-feds-implement-stricter-nationwide-carbon-dioxide-limits-20131217/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/states-urge-feds-implement-stricter-nationwide-carbon-dioxide-limits-20131217/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Air Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=44551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Under current United States EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Clean Air Act regulations, individual States must enact regulations to meet a Federal carbon dioxide standard, but it seems that some States think that other States can do better. Of course, California can&#8217;t say to West Virginia, “Clean up your act,” but there are ways around a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/states-urge-feds-implement-stricter-nationwide-carbon-dioxide-limits-20131217/">States Urge Feds to Implement Stricter Nationwide Carbon Dioxide Limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/states-urge-feds-implement-stricter-nationwide-carbon-dioxide-limits-20131217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44551</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biomass to Electricity &#8211; EPA Warned of Potential Issues</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Harper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=44100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The transformation of biomass to electricity was once considered a carbon neutral energy source. By allowing power plants to substitute natural fuel (biomass) in lieu of coal, they are able to avoid fossil-fuel carbon emissions. This has proven to be an egregiously misinformed strategy. With trees being half water by weight, they automatically come with less [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/">Biomass to Electricity &#8211; EPA Warned of Potential Issues</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/biomass-electricity-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44100</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addressing Climate Change: Power Producers Balk at Carbon Dioxide Limits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/addressing-climate-change-power-producers-balk-carbon-dioxide-limits-20130923/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/addressing-climate-change-power-producers-balk-carbon-dioxide-limits-20130923/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benji Jerew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=41808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the United States, power production, generates fully 33% of the carbon dioxide emissions of all sectors. In an effort to address climate change, a new Environmental Protection Agency [EPA] proposal could cut that number in half. Since United States President Barack Obama took office for his second term, it has been encouraging to see [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/addressing-climate-change-power-producers-balk-carbon-dioxide-limits-20130923/">Addressing Climate Change: Power Producers Balk at Carbon Dioxide Limits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/addressing-climate-change-power-producers-balk-carbon-dioxide-limits-20130923/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">41808</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coal Mining Pollution Neglected by The Environmental Protection Agency</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-mining-pollution-epa-20130503/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-mining-pollution-epa-20130503/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mila Luleva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=36887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced earlier this week, that they will not take any action against coal mining pollution. The reasoning for EPA&#8217;s  inactions is that the agency has &#8220;other priorities&#8221;. It is somehow difficult to comprehend how such agency, which is responsible for protecting the environment from deadly pollutants, harmful to human health, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-mining-pollution-epa-20130503/">Coal Mining Pollution Neglected by The Environmental Protection Agency</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/coal-mining-pollution-epa-20130503/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">36887</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Champions New Air Quality Standards with Major Health Benefits</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/obama-administration-champions-new-air-quality-standards-with-major-health-benefits-20121217/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/obama-administration-champions-new-air-quality-standards-with-major-health-benefits-20121217/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Hutchens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Lung Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Science Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soot]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=29896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In early December, the Obama administration imposed a new air quality standard that aims to reduce the amount of soot released into the air by 20%. Soot, comprised of fine particulate matter, contains microscopic particles that are released from smokestacks, diesel trucks, and wood-burning stoves. In addition to creating a layer of haze in the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/obama-administration-champions-new-air-quality-standards-with-major-health-benefits-20121217/">Obama Administration Champions New Air Quality Standards with Major Health Benefits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/obama-administration-champions-new-air-quality-standards-with-major-health-benefits-20121217/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29896</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenhouse Gas and Black Carbon Tracking &#8211; an Issue for North America</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/greenhouse-gas-and-black-carbon-tracking-an-issue-for-north-america-20121212/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/greenhouse-gas-and-black-carbon-tracking-an-issue-for-north-america-20121212/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Hutchens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=29681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Environmental officials and businesses have a very difficult time estimating the impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction measures between countries or regions of North America due to completely different standards. To improve statistical comparability, Canada, Mexico, and the United States are trying to unify the standards for emissions data. The goal is to work through [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/greenhouse-gas-and-black-carbon-tracking-an-issue-for-north-america-20121212/">Greenhouse Gas and Black Carbon Tracking &#8211; an Issue for North America</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/greenhouse-gas-and-black-carbon-tracking-an-issue-for-north-america-20121212/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29681</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast-Food Lobbyists Fight Biofuel Law</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fast-food-lobbyists-fight-biofuel-law-20121208/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fast-food-lobbyists-fight-biofuel-law-20121208/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Hutchens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 06:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast-food]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=29562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>American fast-food lobbyists are pushing back again an alternative fuel policy that requires gasoline to contain ethanol, a fuel produced from corn, and are asking Congress to repeal the law. Fast-food customers consume corn in two ways. The hamburger and chicken they eat in their meals come from an animals raised on corn. The fuel [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fast-food-lobbyists-fight-biofuel-law-20121208/">Fast-Food Lobbyists Fight Biofuel Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/fast-food-lobbyists-fight-biofuel-law-20121208/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">29562</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
