<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nuclear Reactors Archives &#8211; The Green Optimistic</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/tag/nuclear-reactors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>green tech news, since 2008</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2667534</site>	<item>
		<title>Do the Benefits of Nuclear Power Outweigh the Dangers?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/benefits-dangers-nuclear-power/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/benefits-dangers-nuclear-power/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Annika Tostengard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 18:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduce emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=56493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s Clean Power Plan may actually be undermined if nuclear power plants are shut down. This news comes from a report by to Third Way, a non-partisan think tank located in Washington, DC. The goal of the the administration&#8217;s plan is to cut 32% of fossil fuel emissions by 2035, but the report concludes that without the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/benefits-dangers-nuclear-power/">Do the Benefits of Nuclear Power Outweigh the Dangers?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/benefits-dangers-nuclear-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">56493</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Commercial Nuclear Reactors Compromise On Safety, Report States</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/small-nuclear-reactors-safety-20130930/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/small-nuclear-reactors-safety-20130930/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mila Luleva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe nuclear power]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=42055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Small nuclear reactors, these of less than 300 megawatts, which can be easily constructed and transported to any site of a pressing need of energy, might not come as cheap as vendors claim. A new report by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), entitled &#8220;Small Isn&#8217;t Always Beautiful&#8221;,  points out that these small reactors will [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/small-nuclear-reactors-safety-20130930/">Small Commercial Nuclear Reactors Compromise On Safety, Report States</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/small-nuclear-reactors-safety-20130930/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42055</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storing Nuclear Waste Storage a Big Problem for South Korea</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/storing-nuclear-waste-storage-a-big-problem-for-south-korea-20121121/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/storing-nuclear-waste-storage-a-big-problem-for-south-korea-20121121/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Hutchens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 06:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=28547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>South Korea’s 23 nuclear reactors supply one third of the country’s power. By 2024, South Korea plans to add 11 more nuclear reactors, expanding nuclear power by 50%. But while the country has big plans for nuclear expansion, it’s also grappling with how to handle and store nuclear waste. According to government figures, South Korea [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/storing-nuclear-waste-storage-a-big-problem-for-south-korea-20121121/">Storing Nuclear Waste Storage a Big Problem for South Korea</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/storing-nuclear-waste-storage-a-big-problem-for-south-korea-20121121/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">28547</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Modular, Portable Nuclear Reactors: Energy Solution for Poor Countries?</title>
		<link>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/modular-portable-nuclear-reactors-energy-solution-for-poor-countries-20090626/</link>
					<comments>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/modular-portable-nuclear-reactors-energy-solution-for-poor-countries-20090626/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ovidiu Sandru]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew kadak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babcock And Wilcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babcock Wilcox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exact Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kadak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lynchburg Va]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megawatts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modular nuclear reactor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modular reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Facility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable nuclear reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Us Navy Ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usable Power]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.greenoptimistic.com/?p=3833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Modular thinking has brought us many wonderful things in technology, medicine, and in most exact sciences. I see no reason why it should not work in power generation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com/modular-portable-nuclear-reactors-energy-solution-for-poor-countries-20090626/">Modular, Portable Nuclear Reactors: Energy Solution for Poor Countries?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.greenoptimistic.com">The Green Optimistic</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.greenoptimistic.com/modular-portable-nuclear-reactors-energy-solution-for-poor-countries-20090626/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3833</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
