Daniel G. Nocera of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is the inventor of the most important solar energy system of the century. His 2007 designed system is able to create cheap solar energy based on the photosynthesis process. His work was published last year in Science.
Nocera’s company called Sun Catalytix is one of the 37 ARPA-E awardees last month, receiving $4.1 million for further investigations and development from the U.S. Department of Energy. Polaris Venture Partners has also come with a $3 million investment.
An electrode takes the place of the catalyst which is immersed into water containing cobalt and phosphate. When electricity enters the electrode, the cobalt and phosphate create a film over it, forming a catalyst. This catalyst separates the oxygen molecules from the hydrogen ones. A platinum catalyst is used to convert the hydrogen molecules into hydrogen gas. Hydrogen can be used to power fuel cells which can be used in various applications. The central idea is to use sunlight to enable the chemical reactions. Then the technology will be integrated with solar panels or wind turbines to store energy in liquid or gas fuels which are more energy-dense than the batteries traditionally used for energy storage.
Nocera thinks that this process can be used by each of us at home. The solar panels can power easily the house by day and the stored hydrogen could be used to get electricity at night with a fuel cell. The Sun Catalytix electrolyzer is designed to be made with cheap materials and to work in every water environment. It can even work with dirty or salt water but not with antifreeze.
In order to make the system cheaper, platinum must be replaced by another catalyst. Even though there’s still a lot of work to do, the scientists are on the track to have the system implemented soon.
Liked it? Share onFacebook and Google +1:
| | ![]() See them here! | E-mail Updates |
| Also share story on: | Become our facebook fan |
Read next:
This is a REAL car working with REAL water… through electrolysis. It seems that the re-mix of hydrogen and oxygen actually produces more energy than it takes to split them! Daniel Dingel from Philippines has made 100 motors work on water and wants to spread them to the world, so any country can reverse engineer it and make something better off it. It’s really amazing how we were taught since kids that water only kills fire… not always!
MIT researchers found out a way to create energy by mimicking the photosynthesis process that green plants acquire their energy from. Prof. Daniel G. Nocera and former MIT graduate student Alan F. Heyduk invented a hydrogen-producing compound. They also use a catalyst and small amounts of light.
A team of scientists from the University of Rochester has a tough mission creating a hydrogen fuel cell that not only burns cleanly but the fuel itself has to be created from clean sources. They have developed a process that uses artificial photosynthesis and nanotubes to finalize this project.
Prof. Bruce isolated the core of the photosynthetic process from certain algae, and proved that, if coupled with a platinum catalyst, it could produce hydrogen in the presence of light. Photosynthesis is at the base of our fossil fuel energy, because it comes from the plants that lived here millions of years ago – indirectly, from the Sun.
ARPA-E, or the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy has awarded FastCAP Systems, from Cambridge, MA, with a 2.5 year, $5.35 million grant to further develop and commercialize a nanotube-enhanced ultracapacitor, which could reduce the costs of hybrid and electric cars.





#1 by Steve on April 6, 2010 - 3:39 am
This invention is not creating “cheap solar energy” as stated in the opening paragraph, it is a new electrolysis system using new chemistry that is said to be much more efficient than standard electrolysis devices in converting water into hydrogen and oxygen. The diagram includes the device, and envisions it as part of a solar -> electrolysis -> hydrogen fuel production and storage arrangement that can make energy production a very local affair. But the “cheap solar energy” part is entirely someone else’s responsibility.
#2 by Marc de Piolenc on January 29, 2010 - 12:13 pm
This article is so garbled that it’s impossible to evaluate the technology. Next stop is one of the free patent sites to have a look at what he actually invented.
#3 by karl smith on January 27, 2010 - 8:31 pm
great stuff do not stop now daniel this is great great new teck.
#4 by Bill Ricker on January 26, 2010 - 10:05 pm
Dear Sir:
How efficient is this storage? The solar cell is maybe 15-20% efficient with conversion to electricity. So I’m curious how efficient it stores the electricity?