Home > Environment > Green Policy >

Fuzzy Math, Washington State Wants to Tax Cyclist Carbon Emissions

ID 10041956 300x199 Fuzzy Math, Washington State Wants to Tax Cyclist Carbon Emissions
Washington State Representative Ed Orcutt Wants to Tax Cyclists – For Their Carbon Emissions?

That’s right, Washington State wants to tax cyclists for their use of the roads, citing carbon emissions and the fact they pay no gas tax. For the most part, the gas tax goes toward road maintenance, but since cyclists use no gasoline, then who pays for the infinitesimal wear and tear they inflict on the roads? Surely, drivers of gasoline-powered vehicles would be incensed that those bicycles are getting a free ride? Legislators want to add a $25 tax on all bicycles over $500 in value.

It seems to make sense in some small way, but I’m still having a hard time imagining how much wear and tear a 200-pound cycle and cyclist can put on a road designed for vehicles up to 30 tons. What hurts my brain even more, and this is where the fuzzy math comes in, is the justification of the tax:

“Cyclists have increased heart rate and respiration. That means that the act of riding a bike results in greater emissions of carbon dioxide from the rider. Since CO2 is deemed to be a greenhouse gas and a pollutant, bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride.” – Washington State Representative Ed Orcutt

You’re kidding, right? Orcutt wants to tax cyclist carbon emissions? Even my rudimentary math stills tell me that a cyclist generates about a 10th of a pound of carbon dioxide per mile, which is equivalent to a vehicle that gets somewhere around 180mpg. Washington, taxing bicycle purchases and citing carbon emissions for a mere $1 million to support a $1 billion transportation bill makes absolutely no sense. Why not tax the joggers when they buy sneakers?

Share it


Like our Facebook page


About the author

Ben has been a Master Automobile Technician for over ten years, certified by ASE, Toyota, and Lexus. He specialized in electronic systems and hybrid technology. Branching out now, as a Professional Freelance Writer, he specializes in research and writing about his main area of interest, Automotive Technology, Alternative Fuels, and Concept Vehicles.


Comments

  • Todd Millions

    I’ve seen much more expensive malice than this against the horrid road damage my 70kg butt has caused too gravel autobahns-currently a layed off grader driver can’t figure out why he is no longer needed,now the R.M. of white trash Sask,isn’t grading my 10 km commute up to 6 times a week(no joke-though funny).Were I a rate payer,for this jollity-I’d have being mounting vigorous inquiries for the bill for it some time ago.
    The other unpayed road damage washington state should be looking into is the increase in permitted vechile weights,changed in the 1980’s-first in arkansaws,by a paticularly corrupt governer,at the bequest of tyson meats-according to recent report.This bone headed move became the continental standard, along with removal of 55mph limits.The damages for these are not yet present in any maintenence levy.

Tweet