Maybe the title’s aim is too high (it’s a long way ’till there), but Tesla, followed by other scientists along the last century, discovered the principle of propulsion using strong electromagnetic fields. It’s not about traveling on the ground, but from the ground up, with an extraordinary speed and ease. The entire document is posted on panaceauniversity.org/D8.pdf, here is a short description of what the system does, as described by Patrick J. Kelly (update: the document I mentioned in 2008 doesn’t exist anymore) :
“Tesla performed an experiment in which he applied high-voltage high-frequency alternating current to a pair of parallel metal plates. He found that the ‘space’ between the plates became what he described as “solid-state” exhibiting the attributes of mass, inertia and momentum. That is, the area transformed into a state against which a mechanical push could be exerted. This implied that, using this technique, it should be possible to produce a spaceship drive anywhere in space, if the mechanism for thrusting against the ‘solid-state’ space could be determined. Further experiments convinced Tesla that powerful electromagnetic waves could be used to push against (and pull against) what appears to be ‘empty space’. The drive principle is based on the Hall-effect used in semiconductor magnetic sensors, and is called the magnetohydrodynamic (“MHD”) effect. This might be illustrated like this:
Here, a box is constructed with two metal plates forming opposite sides and two insulating plates holding them in position and surrounding an area of ‘space’. High-frequency, high-voltage alternating current is applied to the metal plates and this creates an electric field “E” acting between the plates as shown in black.
A magnetic field “B” is generated by the electrical field. The magnetic field acts at right-angles to the electric field, as shown in blue. These two fields produce a propulsion thrust “F” shown in red in the diagram. This propulsion force is not produced by ejecting any matter out of the box, instead, it is produced by a reaction against the ‘solid-state’ condition of space-time caused by the high-frequency electromagnetic pulsing of that area of space. This is enormously more effective than a jet engine. The thrust increases with the fourth power of the frequency, so if you double the frequency, the effect is sixteen times greater.
To put this into perspective, consider the force being applied against gravity to lift an object into the air. The force pulling the object downwards is gravity and its strength is given by:
F = g x M x m / r2
G is the gravitational constant (6.672 x 10-8 cm3 g-1 s-2)
M is the mass of the first body
m is the mass of the second body and
r is distance between the two centres of mass
The lifting force is given by:
Lorentz Force: Force on an object = Electric force + Magnetic force
F = q x E + q x v x B
q is the charge on the object,
B is the magnetic field,
v is the velocity of the object and
E is the electric field
How do these forces compare? Well, the electromagnetic force is stronger than the gravitational force by a factor of about 2,200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times. That number (2.2 x 1039) is too big for anybody to really visualise, so let me put it another way.
If the amount of energy used to mechanically lift an object a distance of one hundredth of an inch (one quarter of a millimetre) off the ground, were used as an electromagnetic lifting force, then that amount of energy would lift the object more than 3,472,222,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles off the ground, or in metric units, more than 5,588,001,700,000,000,000,000,000 kilometres off the ground. This kind of drive is an entirely different kind of animal. This Hall-effect type of drive if used in a spaceship would require only a very small amount of input power to drive the ship at great speeds and over great distances.
As the device shown above operates directly on the space-time field which penetrates all matter, there would appear to be no reason why it should not be used to drive a conventional vehicle by positioning it in a horizontal position rather than the vertical position shown in the diagram. Throttle operation could be by very slight adjustment to the frequency of the AC pulses applied to the metal plates. However, Bill Lyne indicates that horizontal movement is better achieved by producing Tesla’s very short, high-voltage high-frequency DC pulses at the front of the vehicle while at the same time generating very high-voltage high-frequency AC waves at the back of the vehicle. This style of drive is said to pull the vehicle along rather than push it along.
Tesla’s Dynamic Theory of Gravity (1897) states that all bodies emit microwaves whose voltage and frequency are determined by their electrical contents and relative motion. He measured the microwave radiation of the earth as being only a few centimetres in wavelength. He said that the frequency and voltage were influenced by the velocity and mass of the earth, and that its gravitational interaction with other bodies, such as the sun, was determined by the interaction of the microwaves between the two bodies.
If you find the concept of producing a driving force through pushing against the space-time continuum to be difficult to accept, then perhaps you should consider the US Patent granted to Boris Volfson on 1st November 2005. The important thing about this patent (which is crammed full of long words) is not whether or not it presents a realistic mechanism for a practical space drive, but the fact that the US Patent Office in the year 2005, granted the patent after what presumably was careful consideration. With that in view, it is hardly possible to consider Tesla to have been totally confused when he designed (and built) his “electric flying machine” which operated by pushing against the space-time field.
Tesla used high voltage at gigahertz frequencies for his electropulsion system. The propulsion of a vehicle powered by a Tesla drive is by the use of an additional AC generator at the back (which stiffens the space-time continuum behind the vehicle) and a DC ‘brush’ generator at the front (which weakens the space-time continuum in front, causing the vehicle to be pulled forwards).
Tesla was very astute. He deduced that ‘empty space’ actually contained:
1. Independent carriers which permeate all space and all matter and from which all matter is made. These carry momentum, magnetism, electricity or electromagnetic force, and can be manipulated artificially or by nature.
2. ‘Primary Solar Rays’ (starlight) which travel at the speed of light, having frequencies far above X-rays, gamma and UV radiation.
3. ‘Cosmic Rays’, particles in space propelled by the Primary Solar Rays.
4. X-rays, Gamma rays and UV electromagnetic waves, all of which travel at the speed of light.
5. Ordinary visible and Infra-Red electromagnetic waves which travel at the speed of light.
6. Rapidly varying electrostatic force of enormous potential, emanating from the earth and other gravitational bodies in space.
When we grasp the actual nature of the universe, it becomes clear that we have a much larger range of opportunities for producing usable energy in large quantities and at minimal cost.”
More like this article
Not what you were looking for? Search The Green Optimistic!
Join the Discussion4027 total comments so far. What's your opinion ?
hi yes i am looking for investors for a project to get 1000 small robots on the next possible comet @........email@example.com
Top Quality article for Creative Scientist, Students and Business People ! This type of Gravity Engines could save humanity after many Years, when created for human use to travel to other planets easily. Because Earth it's 'overused' and one day could colapse all planet BioSystems ! Of course we need to be carefully with High Frequencies, Radio Frequencies new constructed devices and Experimentations. Because it could make damage to human and nature health. Also it could be destroying existing telecomunication systems (phones, tv, computers and etc) But this article it's 'Rare Diamond' for people to create new Eco transportation crafts !
Hi, I would be very interested in any more information that can be supplied about the experiments that Ovidiu Sandru is presently occupied with. I am a member of a group of intersted people and scientists that would be interested in hearing a little more info on this.Thank you.
Sorry Ovidiu Sandru, but the link for book, still are broken. If it is small, can you send to my firstname.lastname@example.org
These are some good reads that i have come across on the internet and elsewhere. They deal with this subject matter and more. To begin to understand this subject requires a great amount of electronics knowledge and some basic physics.Here are a number of links you can begin with,good luck. I am not trying to promote the sale of books -you can find most of these on the web for free or read them online for free.http://www.mauricecotterell.com/gravity1.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Leedskalnin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spintronics
sorry my english is not good enough i was try to replicated grebennikov project ..found out this is an anti gravity machine..[.but not succes]....grebennikov machine create frequency ...ion dicharge...radiant energy....and [ ecs ] built strong gravity it self..... [my theory ]maybe it can fly fast enough and can can made [z ] turn gravity is some sour of wave it have frequency like sound wave ..light wave
NOT CORRECT ABOUT "SPACETIME"(lol). tesla did NOT believe in the DELUSION of space"time" (a relativistic term to conceal the real ether physics)NEITHER did william lyne.BOTH consider spacetime to be a lie to cover up etheric science which can produce power at any point on the earth. "Tesla was actively conducting tangible experiments during the time of EinsteinÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s theoretical research. He underlined that time was a mere man-made reference used for convenience and as such the idea of a Ã¢â‚¬Å“curved space-timeÃ¢â‚¬Â was delusional, hence there was no basis for the Relativistic Ã¢â‚¬Å“space-timeÃ¢â‚¬Â binomium concept."He considered time as a mere man-made Ã¢â‚¬Å“measureÃ¢â‚¬Â of the rate at which events occur such as a distance travelled (in miles or kms) in a certain period of time, for a frame of reference. He considered the Ã¢â‚¬Å“curvingÃ¢â‚¬Â of space to be absurd (putting it in gentle terms) saying that if a moving body curved space the Ã¢â‚¬Å“equal and oppositeÃ¢â‚¬Â reaction of space on the body would Ã¢â‚¬Å“straighten space back outÃ¢â‚¬Å“.Tesla published a prepared statement on his 81st birthday (July 10, 1937) critiquing Albert EinsteinÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s theory of relativity. The following is a portion of that statement:Ã¢â‚¬Å“Ã¢â‚¬Â¦ Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible Ã¢â‚¬â€œ But even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.Ã¢â‚¬Å“ Ã¢â‚¬Å“My second discovery was of a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the entire scientific records in more than a half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.Ã¢â‚¬Â Ã¢â‚¬â€ Nikola TeslaGOOD DISINFO=95% TRUTH,5% LIES
Author: Richard Comment: I've been talking with a friend of mine, who is physicist, that the gravitational field is quite weak in a local event. In other words to create a lifting body of some mass would require a large field that in turn would require a very strong electromagnetic source. This would be enough to fry anything within a fairly large area of that local event occurring before any lift would be established.Your comments please?Hi Richard and of course the web admin Ovidiu Sandru,I actually constrained myself to keep on answering the comment due to my plan to reveal the flying technology using gravitational field in Malaysia around 2013 (My three to four years project starting 2009). ThereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s some items still under delivery (which I ordered) from all over the world, and some of it need to be re-engineered due to the part of the final product was never produce in any country at all. My intentions was to create a backpack consist of 2 side-by-side vortex coils, up and down controller at wrist, miniature 12VDC power supply, HV coils and some part of electronic as the frequency modulator. I do admit that all the technology (compare to late 1940Ã¢â‚¬â„¢s) was already here but still to complete and test flight the final product would be another trial and error approach.I like to answer your comment/question because of it seems like the question that you forward across was the same question I had during my early years in my universityÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s studies. You were right that IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve keep on asking people how to explain all this antigravity things including my universityÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s professor. They not willing to answer and sometimes in bad situations they label you as the Ã¢â‚¬ËœdaydreamerÃ¢â‚¬â„¢.Nowadays you can fairly admit the genuine UFO footage in Ã¢â‚¬ËœyoutubeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ video beside the fake one. The one that I claim as genuine will be the video which is the craft (saucer like) hovering for a few second and then in a blink of an eye, accelerate too fast and vanish; which is defy all know law of physics and momentum It was too fast even the second frame of the film reveals that this craft covers from zero to 1500mile in a second. This kind of acceleration can only be explain using Relativity Time Effect (or Victor Grebennikov use to called it as time-wrapping force-field effect) inside the gravitational field itself.Fairly, to answer your question (and I assume you will forward this answer to you physicist friend which he/she can verify much further), itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s an important and popular fact amongst physicist that the higher the gravitational fields, the slower the time become inside that field, but what the physicist do not know is, the observer in any high or low gravitational field still feels time as one second per one second. Let say, one observer falls into black-hole. He watches his clock all the time. He still sees and feels one second still in one second. As the other observer on outside the black hole (let say in a space ship outside the black hole field) sees the falling observer more freeze in time like a frozen picture when goes nearer and nearer to the black hole.For instant, two same DNA clone boy was places in the first year of their childhood one on earth and the other one on the moon. As we know moon most likely 16% gravitational field from earth. On their 30th earth birthday calendar, the boy from the moon will be much-much older than the boy on earth. This is because time run slower in earth compare to the moon. And both of these boys still feel like normal Ã¢â‚¬Ëœone second per one secondÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ time until their 30th earth birthday calendar.The other explanation which may blow the other normal physicist was the statement which I convey to my universityÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s professor which is; letÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s imagine a situation of one boy want to squash a normal housefly using fly swatter. In the boy experience, the housefly flying too fast in a blink of an eye. But on the other hand, the house fly, sees the boy was a slow moving person almost like a snails. Maybe IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m still young to explain to my universityÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s professor at that time, they just wouldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t believe the next theorem; which is wrongly presented to them about time-wrapping field. My proposed theoretical physics thesis was rejected (in 2001).Now, to answer the time warp energy conservation question (energy conservation was a dominant law for all the physicist around the world) , let say a small 12V battery have a chemical energy that supply 3Ampere of electric current for normally 4 hours before the battery drop dead. In normal earth gravitational field, the battery supplies 12V and 3Ampere for 4 hours. The total power (in watt) will be 12 x 3 = 36 Watt (or Joule per second). In 4 hours, the total energy of that battery will be 60 x 60 x 4 x 36 = 516.4 kilojoules in normal earth gravitational field.Let say my device was produce a field that actually shield the normal earth gravitational field and the time do running faster inside the produce field. This means, one second on outside the field is still one second, but one second inside the field was stretch out to a minute. As the person inside the field still feels normal second, he sees that person outside the field much-much slower. As the person outside the fields will see the person inside the field moving too fast.The conservation of energy for the battery which is total of (based on normal chemical process) was 516.4kilo Joules, inside the field the total battery energy would be 60 x 60 x 60 x 4 x 36 = 31.1 Mega Joules!Base on both calculations, it is true as you friends the physicist explains we would require enormous energy to lift a person to air, but as the time distort inside the field, the small energy using inside the field will become enormous outside the field. And that person actually protected. And as all normal physicists would say, the calculation would be valid as long as the total energy is conserve.I know this calculation seems a bit rush to any normal physicist, as I still not publish any paper to explain this phenomenon, but I foresee that we as physicist maybe need another theorem to create a logical explanation whatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s happen inside the fields.Last statement to bake an idea inside your mind will be Ã¢â‚¬Å“let say, there are two 100meter runner in starting point. One of the runner using my device which he shield himself from earth gravitational field and multiple his time to 1/60 second and the other runner was not. And let the race begin. After 0.16 second, the runner; who wears my device finishes the race. And then, 10 second later, the normal (without the device runner) finish the race. Bear in mind that both of the runner still feels that they run like a normal the 100 meter race and use the same muscle's energy, but only different that the time that they experience will be different. So as both runnersÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ energy conserve. We can see who will be the only winner is.Wallahualam, Thanks.P/s: let me give you my email 'email@example.com' for any further discussion about my Three to Four years project development.
I've been talking with a friend of mine, who is physist, that the gravitational feild is quite weak in a local event. In other words to create a lifting body of some mass would require a large feild that in turn would require a very strong electomagnetic source. This would be enough to fry anything withen a fairly large area of that local event occuring before any lift wouild be established.Your comments please?
Does it use the phase displacement drive? http://tinyurl.com/nuclear-fusion-starship
Hello, sometimes I feel that there is indeed "global awakening" because I did come to the very close ideas just by studying Faraday disc and Lorentz law. Before proceeding with build, could you please answer: - have you tried to shield your prototype to block harmful radiation? It should be doable. But maybe it will not work then. Like schrew of a ship needs open water to work. - it is clear with the coil part, I have pretty good idea how to do it, not clear is the plate capacitor part, should it get same high amperage low voltage as the coil, or should it get high voltage and low amperage?
Dear Richard Draine and of course Ovidiu Sandru,Since I published the comment in this website (in 2009) for my reverse engineering UFO technology, I was referring to the antigravity (chitin) plate device that been created by Victor Grebennikov in 1992 to 1997, IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve been contacted by several individual who interested to this cheap, simple but advance technology. Even that the actual basic of this technology were based on Alternating Current Lorentz Force (one must not confuse with the standard Lorentz Force which is published by Hendrik Antoon Lorentz in 1892), it still poses 3 parts problem to people.First - The base Ã¢â‚¬Ëœvortex coilÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ (which I shows how-to-made in Ã¢â‚¬Ëœdeackenz youtubeÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ page) from his bottom (chitin) antigravity plate device (in his flying picture - underneath his wood base-plate -- please search for it), were actually induces a very strong electromagnetic (radio) wave. In my practical approach, around 13 kHz in frequency were created by the Ã¢â‚¬Ëœ12V Florescent Lamp InverterÃ¢â‚¬â„¢. This strong electromagnetic wave exposure will cause some serious cancer related illness. This is being revealed by Victor Grebennikov himself in the end of his days in 2001.Second - He was using the handle bars made by iron rod (with some rubber grippers) and by touching the exposed part of his iron rod (you can see in his flying picture Ã¢â‚¬â€œ his left thumb -- again, please search for it), will transfer a very high voltage (with very low ampere) through his body (mimicking chitin electrostatic of an insect). But because of the high-voltage current being supply was very low (stapping up by a small motorcycle ignition coil to produce very high AC voltage) and at the same time 13 kHz AC voltage frequency (same frequency as the one that entered the Ã¢â‚¬Ëœvortex coilsÃ¢â‚¬â„¢); this will produce the Ã¢â‚¬Ëœskin effectÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ tendency which protects his major organ from the effect of electrical shock. But in long exposure to high frequency electric field around his body still causes more harm to his old-age health.Third - He did mention of time-wrapping force-field was created around him once heÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s flying. Even the force-field protects him from wind resistant when he moving forward. The bad news is, the force-field still consume his age. Even he feels like normal time when heÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s flying, the time outside of the field were moving slower, in contradict with the actual standard time (as we feels it normally now) he is actually move in much faster time-rate as normal human outside the field. By using this device frequently, his age began to be taking away from him and he only knew this effect after 3 years using the device (around 1995 to 1997).Accept that you wanted to get cancer, burn your skin alive and wasted your precious life years, feel free to built one (I do publish a guide inside my Ã¢â‚¬Ëœdeackenz wordpressÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ blog on how-to-built). My previous experiment was using small miniature vortex coil (as center drive coil) sandwich by 2 zinc plate (or can easily replace with 2 thick aluminum plate) in saucer shape. Several tests to my device were made and very successful in flying. Hope my long answer will help you answer why not seeing many people develop this kind of craft.Wallahualam, Thanks.
If these things are easy to built why is are we not seeing many people developing these craft. Excuse my ignorance am I missing something e.g supression , finiancial obligation or resource availability.Regards Riccardo Francisco Deraine.
VERY GOOD ARTICLE ! I JUST NOT PAY ATENTION TO COMENTS WITH PESIMISTIC NOTES ! THANKS WEB SITE ADMIN FOR CREATING VERY VALUABLE INFO ARTICLES FOR STUDENTS, SCIENCE PEOPLE, BUSINESS, TECHNOICIANS AND ETC.
I have seen things like this done by many people over the last 20 years or so. John Hutchinson. (Made all kinds of gadgets that replicated effects like the philidelphia experiment). Steven mark (Invented a coil that made electricity BUT ALSO create a noticable gyroscopic effect as a by product of his device The Kapagen-(Made by a russian gentleman) Makes electricity.Take the PACL DRONE--witnesses claim they heard a crackling sound as it flew over-HMMM crackling??? High voltage? Look at the so called schematic for the thing and you may be confused by all the unreadable glyphs all over it. Just look at it like a giant antenna--or many around a single antenna. This thing is running multiple frequencies along with high voltage,why would some of those inner leads in the torus be shorter and some longer???? Hmmmm Just what we should be doing with the lifter.
Bill Cosby during a standup show says the following; -Build me an Ark! -What is an ark?The space habitation craft- The space travelling craft- The space bending and far reaching exploration craft- The universe bending, interuniversal exploration craft http://www.facebook.com/pages/How-to-make-a-spacecraft-Uzay-gemisi-nasil-yapilir/110157509055877?ref=mf
I've been conduct some experiment at home which using High frequency AC magnetic field vs AC electric field in 90 degree orientation. The result?? the propulsion increase with the amount of electric power (in watt) input.At first I used High Frequency with High Voltage/Low Ampere E-Field and same High Frequency with Low Voltage/High Ampere B-Field...I was wrong...Lorentz force was not design for high E-Field to lift. But when I use High Ampere generate the lifting property at the metal plate as your drawings, the lifting property was a success.The power supply I'd used was 40W 12VDC Florescent Lamp Ballast with some modification at the output voltage transformer give very low voltage and high ampere output (which at normal operating the device will give high voltage output with low ampere).By referring to your drawing, I used solenoid coil (hundred of looping) to generate High B-field and the end of solenoid coil wires will terminate directly to the metal plate which will generate the E-field. High Ampere will charge the plate faster then low ampere current input. By this assembly, same frequency of high frequency AC will applied because of the close loop circuit assembly.Each time, the vector of B-Field and E-Field cross in AC frequency, the Force vector will orient to the same direction. What concerns me in my home made experiment was and I claim that there's no "ion wind" being generate but the thing did have force to move forward and/or upward. The Force that being generate with this homemade device would be nearly 40W of thrust.And finally what surprise me, 40W of power was P=(F*d)/t. P as power(in Watt), F as force(in newton), d as distance(in meter), and t as time(in second). Just imagine what 40W would give the force to lift a thing 1 meter upward in one second? It's a big WOW!Wallahualam. Thanks.
Creo que la respuestas a el desarrollo de nuevos energÃƒÂ©ticos , los vÃƒÂ¡s a encontrar en los circulos que Dios Padre , diseÃƒÂ±ÃƒÂ³ en los trigales de Inglaterra. No se mucho sobre energÃƒÂas , pero yo encuentro belleza , plasticidad y equilibrio en muchos de sus diseÃƒÂ±os. En especial , me llama la atenciÃƒÂ³n uno de ellos , que bien podemos discutir con mucho gusto.Saludos Ing Pascual
Hello Roger and Admin: I think that if you guys would do a little research you will find that more than a few individuals have concluded from their research that Tesla's "electropulsion" drive system for manned or unmanned craft wss a reality established no later than the early 1900's. Mr. William Lyne's publications are a good source for info in this subject. One title in particular by the name of "Occult Ether Physics" is very close to describing how this technology works. It's been around for some time now gentlemen....Dennis
nobody said that was a UFO, but you have to start from somewhere... Nor any explanation is given that the "lifting" force is based on some gas (that's why you may say it doesn't work in vacuum). Momentarily it's just a theory.
These were popular a few years ago with people calling them "lifters". The "ionocraft" entry in Wikipedia is a good source of information and pictures. Someone in my school built one as a science fair project back in the 1970s.They're not "anti-gravity" though, any more than a helicopter. And they're no good for spacecraft - they don't work in vacuum.