Comments on: How To Build an UFO-like Anti Gravity Spacecraft http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/03/05/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/ pure green energy optimism Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:43:10 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Deacken Frost http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/03/05/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/comment-page-1/#comment-28824 Deacken Frost Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:28:52 +0000 http://www.greenoptimistic.com/index.php/2008/02/10/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/#comment-28824 I've been conduct some experiment at home which using High frequency AC magnetic field vs AC electric field in 90 degree orientation. The result?? the propulsion increase with the amount of electric power (in watt) input. At first I used High Frequency with High Voltage/Low Ampere E-Field and same High Frequency with Low Voltage/High Ampere B-Field...I was wrong...Lorentz force was not design for high E-Field to lift. But when I use High Ampere generate the lifting property at the metal plate as your drawings, the lifting property was a success. The power supply I'd used was 40W 12VDC Florescent Lamp Ballast with some modification at the output voltage transformer give very low voltage and high ampere output (which at normal operating the device will give high voltage output with low ampere). By referring to your drawing, I used solenoid coil (hundred of looping) to generate High B-field and the end of solenoid coil wires will terminate directly to the metal plate which will generate the E-field. High Ampere will charge the plate faster then low ampere current input. By this assembly, same frequency of high frequency AC will applied because of the close loop circuit assembly. Each time, the vector of B-Field and E-Field cross in AC frequency, the Force vector will orient to the same direction. What concerns me in my home made experiment was and I claim that there's no "ion wind" being generate but the thing did have force to move forward and/or upward. The Force that being generate with this homemade device would be nearly 40W of thrust. And finally what surprise me, 40W of power was P=(F*d)/t. P as power(in Watt), F as force(in newton), d as distance(in meter), and t as time(in second). Just imagine what 40W would give the force to lift a thing 1 meter upward in one second? It's a big WOW! Wallahualam. Thanks. I’ve been conduct some experiment at home which using High frequency AC magnetic field vs AC electric field in 90 degree orientation. The result?? the propulsion increase with the amount of electric power (in watt) input.

At first I used High Frequency with High Voltage/Low Ampere E-Field and same High Frequency with Low Voltage/High Ampere B-Field…I was wrong…Lorentz force was not design for high E-Field to lift. But when I use High Ampere generate the lifting property at the metal plate as your drawings, the lifting property was a success.

The power supply I’d used was 40W 12VDC Florescent Lamp Ballast with some modification at the output voltage transformer give very low voltage and high ampere output (which at normal operating the device will give high voltage output with low ampere).

By referring to your drawing, I used solenoid coil (hundred of looping) to generate High B-field and the end of solenoid coil wires will terminate directly to the metal plate which will generate the E-field. High Ampere will charge the plate faster then low ampere current input. By this assembly, same frequency of high frequency AC will applied because of the close loop circuit assembly.

Each time, the vector of B-Field and E-Field cross in AC frequency, the Force vector will orient to the same direction.
What concerns me in my home made experiment was and I claim that there’s no “ion wind” being generate but the thing did have force to move forward and/or upward. The Force that being generate with this homemade device would be nearly 40W of thrust.

And finally what surprise me, 40W of power was P=(F*d)/t. P as power(in Watt), F as force(in newton), d as distance(in meter), and t as time(in second). Just imagine what 40W would give the force to lift a thing 1 meter upward in one second? It’s a big WOW!

Wallahualam. Thanks.

]]> By: Antonio Pascual http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/03/05/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/comment-page-1/#comment-5534 Antonio Pascual Fri, 24 Apr 2009 06:33:44 +0000 http://www.greenoptimistic.com/index.php/2008/02/10/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/#comment-5534 Creo que la respuestas a el desarrollo de nuevos energéticos , los vás a encontrar en los circulos que Dios Padre , diseñó en los trigales de Inglaterra. No se mucho sobre energías , pero yo encuentro belleza , plasticidad y equilibrio en muchos de sus diseños. En especial , me llama la atención uno de ellos , que bien podemos discutir con mucho gusto. Saludos Ing Pascual Creo que la respuestas a el desarrollo de nuevos energéticos , los vás a encontrar en los circulos que Dios Padre , diseñó en los trigales de Inglaterra. No se mucho sobre energías , pero yo encuentro belleza , plasticidad y equilibrio en muchos de sus diseños. En especial , me llama la atención uno de ellos , que bien podemos discutir con mucho gusto.

Saludos
Ing Pascual

]]> By: Dennis http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/03/05/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/comment-page-1/#comment-3707 Dennis Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:59:23 +0000 http://www.greenoptimistic.com/index.php/2008/02/10/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/#comment-3707 Hello Roger and Admin: I think that if you guys would do a little research you will find that more than a few individuals have concluded from their research that Tesla's "electropulsion" drive system for manned or unmanned craft wss a reality established no later than the early 1900's. Mr. William Lyne's publications are a good source for info in this subject. One title in particular by the name of "Occult Ether Physics" is very close to describing how this technology works. It's been around for some time now gentlemen.... Dennis Hello Roger and Admin:
I think that if you guys would do a little research you will find that more than a few individuals have concluded from their research that Tesla’s “electropulsion” drive system for
manned or unmanned craft wss a reality established no later than the early 1900’s. Mr. William Lyne’s publications are a good source for info in this subject. One title in particular
by the name of “Occult Ether Physics” is very close to describing how this technology works. It’s been around for some time now gentlemen….

Dennis

]]> By: admin http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/03/05/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/comment-page-1/#comment-13 admin Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:31:30 +0000 http://www.greenoptimistic.com/index.php/2008/02/10/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/#comment-13 nobody said that was a UFO, but you have to start from somewhere... Nor any explanation is given that the "lifting" force is based on some gas (that's why you may say it doesn't work in vacuum). Momentarily it's just a theory. nobody said that was a UFO, but you have to start from somewhere… Nor any explanation is given that the “lifting” force is based on some gas (that’s why you may say it doesn’t work in vacuum). Momentarily it’s just a theory.

]]> By: Roger http://www.greenoptimistic.com/2008/03/05/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/comment-page-1/#comment-12 Roger Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:19:11 +0000 http://www.greenoptimistic.com/index.php/2008/02/10/how-to-build-an-ufo-like-anti-gravity-spacecraft/#comment-12 These were popular a few years ago with people calling them "lifters". The "ionocraft" entry in Wikipedia is a good source of information and pictures. Someone in my school built one as a science fair project back in the 1970s. They're not "anti-gravity" though, any more than a helicopter. And they're no good for spacecraft - they don't work in vacuum. These were popular a few years ago with people calling them “lifters”. The “ionocraft” entry in Wikipedia is a good source of information and pictures. Someone in my school built one as a science fair project back in the 1970s.

They’re not “anti-gravity” though, any more than a helicopter. And they’re no good for spacecraft – they don’t work in vacuum.

]]>