Schematic of How to Build a Magnetic Motor

perendev's magnetic motor
Perendev’s magnetic motor

I am dealing with true inventions every day. I am also seeing a lot of hoaxes in my daily quest to alternative energy. I have learned that energy is not free, perpetual motion machines do not exist, everything is taken from somewhere and put elsewhere. There also is this so-called “free energy“, the zero-point energy, proven mathematically by many scientists. My duty as a green optimistic is to collect everything I see someone has struggled explaining and demonstrating, put it in one place and let the people see and comment.

Also, there are “green pessimistic” websites. When they see something out of “common sense” boundaries, they freak out and scream something “omg, this can’t be real! I need no proof! I must not think of this! Perish, Satan!”

I took such an article today as an inspiration because it talks about a magnetic to mechanical energy converter, one of my favourite subjects, about I haven’t heard much lately.

Here is the whole process of transforming the magnetic energy into mechanical energy, explained by the invetion’s author (Sandeep Acharya):

“Think of Two Powerful Magnets. One fixed plate over rotating disk with North side parallel to disk surface, and other on the rotating plate connected to small gear G1. If the magnet over gear G1′s north side is parallel to that of which is over Rotating disk then they both will repel each other. Now the magnet over the left disk will try to rotate the disk below in (think) clock-wise direction.

Now there is another magnet at 30 angular distance on Rotating Disk on both side of the magnet M1. Now the large gear G0 is connected directly to Rotating disk with a rod. So after repulsion if Rotating-Disk rotates it will rotate the gear G0 which is connected to gear G1. So the magnet over G1 rotate in the direction perpendicular to that of fixed-disk surface.



Now the angle and teeth ratio of G0 and G1 is such that when the magnet M1 moves 30 degree, the other magnet which came in the position where M1 was, it will be repelled by the magnet of Fixed-disk as the magnet on Fixed-disk has moved 360 degrees on the plate above gear G1. So if the first repulsion of Magnets M1 and M0 is powerful enough to make rotating-disk rotate 30-degrees or more the disk would rotate till error occurs in position of disk, friction loss or magnetic energy loss.

The space between two disk is just more than the width of magnets M0 and M1 and space needed for connecting gear G0 to rotating disk with a rod. Now I’ve not tested with actual objects. When designing you may think of losses or may think that when rotating disk rotates 30 degrees and magnet M0 will be rotating clock-wise on the plate over G2 then it may start to repel M1 after it has rotated about 25 degrees, the solution is to use more powerful magnets.

If all the objects are made precisely with measurements given and the rectangular cubic magnets are powerful enough to rotate more then 30 degrees in first repulsion then the system will work.

Here friction and other losses are neglected as magnets are much more powerful. But think of friction between rotating disk and Shaft, it can be neglected by using magnetic joint between them.

On the left primary measurements of needed objects are given. If you find any reason of not running this mechanism let me know.”

magneticdiagram Schematic of How to Build a Magnetic Motor

It seems to me that this is basically the Perendev magnetic motor presented in the same-named category of this blog.

What do you think? Could it work?



You may also like to read about:







By Ovidiu
on July 17th, 2008
Get E-mail Updates Subscribe by RSS

Free Energy, magnet motor, magnetic engine, magnetic motor, magnetic motor free, magnetic motor free plans, magnetic motor plans, magnetic motors, Magnetic Power

  1. #1 by mbridges on June 24, 2010 - 6:26 am

    Magnets are not the source of the energy. Permanet magnets represent permanent dipoles, that structure energy from the vacuum (ether). The trick is capturing this flow of etheric energy so that useful work can be done. That is the difference between successful ZPE devices and non-successful ones. Tesla showed us that it could be done, and many inventors since have succeeded in reproducing the finding with a host of different kinds of devices.

  2. #2 by Geoff Fritz on July 9, 2010 - 8:53 am

    Permanent magnets are not a source of energy or a means to pull energy from no where. Testla did a lot of terrific things but did not promise energy from nothing.

  3. #3 by Geoff Fritz on July 9, 2010 - 9:19 am

    Magnets do not contain energy. If by some means a magnet was able to be charged with enough energy to power a house for a year or two it would explode like a bomb if the energy were to be released at once. I haven’t heard of exploding magnets.

    Why do people quote videos on YouTube as proof? I can make all sorts of claims and post it on there if it helps. How about I post a video that says “Magnet motors and all forms of free energy are scams”. Because it is on YT it must be true. The video will show lots of motors not turning. Proof enough?

    LOL

  4. #4 by Merak Marey on August 8, 2010 - 7:24 am

    Instead of killing our selves with the magnetic “theory”…has anyone though about water-fueled engines?..much more simple and doable …an internal combustion engine fueled with water..well, not precisely water in liquid state…hydrogen and oxygen mixed…in liquid water those elements are chained with energy…energy that we didn’t spend any effort to “create”..(nature did the job for us)..and its contained in the molecular union..so the prob is to decompose the liquid water into those elements using small amounts of energy (i think radio waves could do the job), and burn those elements in a effective engine…can this be done or what?…any guru can help?…

(will not be published)