DIY Back EMF Recovery System: Electric Motors Close to Overunity?

 DIY Back EMF Recovery System: Electric Motors Close to Overunity?

Thane Heins - The Back EMF Recovery System's inventor - courtesy TheStar.com

… I already see grumpy comments on this article. In fact, every time I present some piece of news that isn’t framed into the same old scientifically and universally-agreed box, people are starting to oppose and suddenly, a lot of the enlightened and bright engineering minds reduce themselves to a state of denial, which not only that does not filter information, but neglects proven facts, if they are not supported by a strong and all-agreed theory from behind.

So has this man been confronted with. His name is Thane Heins, and he has seemingly discovered something science believes it is not possible: to increase the power of an electric motor by applying the same amount of energy at its input.

Every electric motor has a force that opposes the propelling electromagnetic field inside it, called “Back EMF”. Heins succeeded to recover this back-EMF and, instead of letting it cause resistance, he transformed it into useful power. This claim has brought him opposition for many years from the scientific community, because it seems to violate Lenz’s law (Lenz’s law gives the direction of the induced electromotive force (emf) and current resulting from electromagnetic induction. The law provides a physical interpretation of the choice of sign in Faraday’s law of induction, indicating that the induced emf and the change in flux have opposite signs. Heinrich Lenz formulated the law in 1834. – source: wikipedia). His device can accelerate a motor from 100 rpm to 3,500 rpm without increasing power.

He was even contacted by NASA and several engineers and scientists who wanted to see his claims. He always obliged and showed the people his invention, saying he has got nothing to hide. Furthermore, Heins wants to make the details of his technology public and free, so anyone could reproduce it.



Heins’s most important partner is with California Diesel & Power, a $10-million company selling backup generators for cellphone towers in California, with AT&T being one of its largest customers.
Owen Charles, head of technology at California D&P, viewed Heins’ demonstration videos on YouTube last year and was intrigued. He flew to Ottawa for a live demonstration and was convinced the technology worked, at least enough to pursue it further. Tyler Hamilton, from CleanBreak, has a more detailed story on Heins.

The Back-EMF recovery system is not a perpetual motion machine – yet. He only claims to have improved the efficiency of the electric motor, but by doing that, he says the invention is approaching overunity, and possibly zero-point energy collection. His device can accelerate a motor from 100 rpm to 3,500 rpm without increasing power.

Now, that is as far and I go with Heins. By doing a brief search on Google, you may find out there are more than one inventions that harness the back-EMF. One of them even shows a principle schematic of such a device you can build in your garage:

back emf recovery 261x300 DIY Back EMF Recovery System: Electric Motors Close to Overunity?

It seems to me, at a first sight, that this device’s mechanism is similar to that of the Tesla 4-battery charger. I don’t know if I’m fully right, but if there is anyone out there reading this article, and having experimented with such devices, please leave a message on the comments field below, so everybody can see it and make an opinion about its functionality.

I still believe there is so much to discover in science that I find hard to believe that only some 200-years-old experiments are reflecting the reality in its entirety. Even if I don’t understand everything an experimenter with wild ideas does in his garage, I don’t say he couldn’t be right, because most of the world’s greatest ideas did come from a backyard garage, done by some student who quit school for making his ideas come true (well, this is the case with modern times’ students, but the law generally applies to all times).



You may also like to read about:







By Ovidiu
on March 5th, 2009
Get E-mail Updates Subscribe by RSS

back emf, back emf recovery, efficient electric motor, electric motor technology, emf recovery system, Free Energy, lenz law, overunity, thane heins, thane heins back emf, thane heins motor

  1. #1 by Tommey Reed on April 19, 2009 - 3:13 am

    Hello,

    The is my experiments with back EMF:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KICRqPkeTM4&feature=channel_page

  2. #2 by David Davis on June 27, 2009 - 4:32 am

    If perpetual motion ever is possible, it will be through combining a motor such as this that can accelerate to high speeds on a steady current, and drives a generator through a low gearing. If I understand this motor right, then it should continuously accelerate just like a rocket, achieving higher efficiency the faster it goes.

    I know this is supposed to be impossible… but the \’law\’ of conservation of energy is based on observation, and violoting this is no whackier than \’quantum\’ or \’negative\’ energy in my opionion!

    This is an idea that occured to me over 20 years ago, and though moderately educated in mechanics and physics, I have not yet seen what could be wrong with it. I can simultaneously see how it would work, and see why it should not work… it boggles my mind still and hopefully me writing this here will lead to some answers!

  3. #3 by Tommey Reed on June 27, 2009 - 2:22 pm

    http://video.yahoo.com/watch/4897183/13047931

    This is a basic back EMF design I use, this shows that just from EMF energy you can use this for another power source.

  4. #4 by Tommey Reed on June 27, 2009 - 2:49 pm

    I have my rotary piston engine, that show it could have a efficiency of over 85%. This engine could run on any type of fuels and even air its self. This design allows piston to travel in a circle, instead a moving up/down. My basic rotary design show just how much power this engine can produce. This is patented, and I must try to get this engine produced.

    A basic 12″ rotary with a piston area of 1 in/sq, with a 12″ rotor or having a 6″ power stroke.
    This is calculated to show how much torque at say 120 psi, so 120 psi would have a total output of ((120*6″)/12)= 60 pounds of force.
    Using this basic understanding, if a combustion of fuel is used at 800psi up to 2000 psi then we will have ((800*6″)/12)=400 ft/lb or ((2000*6″)/12)=1000 ft/lb this show just with a piston size of 1 in/sq could do. Now if we use air as a force to move the rotary piston with a constant air flow of 120psi use the same 12″ rotary we could get a total output of ((120*6″)/12)= 60 lb. at 3600 rpms would be (60*3600)/5252)=41.13 hp.
    This engine has a 350% powerstroke, unlike any engine today.

    Tom…

(will not be published)