Home Environment Climate Change

Fox News Battles Imaginary Global Warming Bias with Actual Global Warming Bias


Fox NewsIt’s no wonder that getting people to believe that global warming is a bona fide phenomenon, let alone getting them to take action to combat it, is an uphill battle. Earlier this year, in a study published in the journal Public Understanding of Science, researchers found that politically conservative media outlets like Fox News actually perpetuate the myth that global warming isn’t a reality which in turn decreases viewer trust in scientists.

For instance, the news stories that occurred leading up to the release of the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report demonstrated that conservative media outlets perpetuated the illusion of a false balance on the issue. Fox News was particularly guilty, representing climate contrarians in 69% of their IPCC stories.

After being accused of having a bias in their news reporting, Fox had a non-expert, Marlo Lewis, from a conservative fossil fuel-funded think tank, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, deny publicly that there is an expert consensus on human-caused global warming – even after a peer reviewed studied earlier this year demonstrated that 97% of peer reviewed climate abstracts and papers about the cause of global warming all agree that humans are responsible.

The right is able to dismiss global warming through five effective tactics: conspiracy theories, using fake experts, cherry picking the information reported, calling for impossible expectations of what scientific research is able to deliver, and intentional misrepresentation of the issue and logical fallacies.

Climate change contrarians also politicize the issue. Instead of it being about the earth as we know it going into a steep decline based on human actions, the issue becomes instead the political agenda of left-wing liberals. The tagline of Fox News is Fair and Balanced. Hmm… Not so much.

The only thing this squaring off does is waste precious time that should be spent on taking action.

(Visited 227 times, 1 visits today)


  1. Leigh,
    You either misread http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/10/16/balance-is-not-bias-fox-news-critics-mislead-public-on-climate-change/ on Fox News or deliberately misrepresent it.

    As I emphasize in the article, most climate skeptics and
    contrarians – myself included – acknowledge the reality of man-made warming.
    We, too, are part of the alleged 97% “consensus” that you mistakenly think
    refutes my argument.
    By ignoring the real and deep divisions among climate
    experts, you conceal how flimsy the case for climate “action” has become.
    http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Climate%20model%20results/over%20estimate.pdfhttp://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Climate%20model%20results/over%20estimate.pdf– not just skeptics – now
    question whether IPCC climate models are accurate enough to forecast climate
    change. http://epaabuse.com/14431/news/memo-al-gore-ipcc-report-confirms-planetary-emergency/ implicitly disavows the doomsday scenarios that would
    make climate change a “planetary emergency” or “crisis.”
    Most importantly, many experts
    http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/1/011001/pdf/1748-9326_8_1_011001.pdf that renewable energy sources and technologies are up to
    the tasks of either “re-powering America” or rescuing developing countries from
    deadly energy poverty.
    In short, your appeal to “consensus” distracts readers from
    the serious risk that the usual menu of climate “solutions” — carbon taxes, cap-and-trade, mandatory production quota for renewable energy, bans or moratoria on fossil-energy production — would do more harm
    than good.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.