How to Build a Gravity Engine: The Pinwheel Free Energy Generator

Thanks,Oren,I am still continuing my research work,we want to make a perfect Gravity engine,more compact and more efficient.The research will not stop.

I am 75 percent sure,that this gravity powered generator works on the principle I used!
I am Aman. Perpetual motion machines are impossible. I am inventing an engine that runs on gravity for small domestic use and also optimising it for next world future cars. But my engine is not a perpetual motion machine!
This is “gravity-piston impulse kinetic power technology.” It’s like releasing a heavy ball over a small, lightweight ball at some distance from the earth’s surface in a vacuum. This means, without any considerable reduction of speed of the bigger ball travelling towards the ground, the smaller balls get extra energy due to gravitational amplification. Well, my engine works on a similar principle. In other words, it works on the principle of gravitational amplification.
What happens is very similar to this equation: “Impulsive gravitational energy absorbed and used by lightweight small ball from the heavy ball due to gravitational amplification plus standard gravity (9.8); as output electricity (converted) equals small loss of big ball due to impulse resistance/back reactance plus energy equivalent to go against standard gravity plus fictional energy loss plus impulsive energy applied.” I can’t disclose the whole concept to general public because we want to apply for a patent. There are a few diagrams relating to my idea, but I fear someone would copy them. Please wait until I get patent so that I can disclose my engine’s whole concept.
At first, I intended to produce products only for domestic use and as a camping accessory. I am doing more research for increasing power output so that it can be used in the future in cars. My engine uses heavy weight piston gears, and four flywheels in an unconventional and different way and pusher rods, but not balls. It was necessary for me to use the example of balls to explain the basic idea I used in my concept. (The ball system is analogous to the piston-gear system I am using in my engine).
I want to release one more secret of why might non Perpectual magnetic engines get power from magnets,continuously,
Magnetic engines? Yes, possible but they are not perpetual.
Photons (light) hit the atomic particles continuously to compress particles inside atoms and thus store energy in them similar to a compression spring in the form of nuclear energy!So you can extract that energy to get required electrical power!
So non-perpetual magnetic engines are possible, but some people can cheat by claiming to invent perpetual machines.
Well,I mean to say,”Analogous “,which means similar.Both his and mine may use similar basic principle /idea but the working mechanism may be totally different!

i have just read this page and i believe it would work but i also believe that it will not rotate fast enough to produce a significant amount of electricity. it is a very good idea but will not fulfil the future’s energy needs.

tonydeletiy1912@yahoo.com

DEAR SIR:

MY NAME IS TONY AND I AM A STOCK BROKER FROM THE U.S.A. MY MISSION IS TO FIND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR MY THOUSANDS OF INVESTORS LOOKING TO INVEST IN ANY AREA IN THE WORLD THAT PRODUCES ELECTRICITY FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN OILS.
RIGHT NOW I AM TRAVELLING FOR THE NEXT FOUR WEEKS. IF YOU HAVE AN INTEREST IN SHOWING YOUR “WORKING MODEL” AND PROVING TO OUR TECHNICAL ENGINEERS THAT YOUR ITEM OR SOMEONE ELSES DOES WHAT IS CLAIMED, THEN PLEASE CONTACT ME BY E-MAIL.
IF I DO NOT HEAR FROM YOU WITHIN THE NEXT FOUR WEEKS, THEN I WILL ASSUME YOUR ITEM OR ITEMS ARE NOT READY FOR INVESTORS AND MY ENGINEERS TO ACCEPT AS VALID.

NOTE: HAVE INVESTORS WAITING TO INVEST AND HAVE CUSTOMERS WAITING TO PURCHASE. A “WIN” “WIN” SITUATION.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND EFFORTS.

SINCERELY,

TONY DELETIY

tonydeletiy1912@yahoo.com

Theuns,
I’m not sure you are understanding the operation of this machine.
When the weight ball is at the bottom of the lower cylinder it has not loaded the top cylinder with more weight that itself. What moves the rotation is both the combined weight of the right side cylinder’s fluid, and the energy push received by the bottom push bar. These equal two times the energy for the rotation that the bottom ball represents to counter the rotation.
With the left side ball having been pushed to the axis, and when the rotation begins the top weight contributing to the rotation, successful operation is achieved.
Don’t forget to see the fluid weight in the right side cylinder.
Thank you,
Russell Lee

i think the free energy in a combination of electromagnetism,gravity and solar electricity will provide for a perpetual energy mechanism,it will be a great idea to work on using all the three free resourses

I’m sorry but I think it is you that has missed the point of our discussion. Your statement that essentially all science is ridiculous is both ignorant and insulting. You wouldn’t be sitting there typing on a computer, communicating over the internet, in your nice heated/air conditioned home without science. Take a step back and take a bit more of your own advice before making such bold, unsubstantiated claims.

Thank you for your feedback on that. I appreciate your input there.

As for Tesla, many of his inventions were not suppressed, but are in use
today, such as alternating current, wireless transmission, and others.

Many more of his inventions have patents but seem to be neglected.
Maybe for good reason, I don’t know. Based on the obvious genius of
the man, he appears to me to have been way ahead of his contemporaries,
and might be even today if he was still alive.

Here is an interesting site which outlines Tesla’s work, but perhaps
unfinished would be a better word to describe some of it, rather than
suppressed.

fuel-efficient-vehicles.org/tesla-flying-machine/Tesla-lost-inventions.php

I do think that Big Oil interests actively suppress any technology that
threatens their monopoly. If people had access to free energy, the oil
companies would lose their economic control over everything energy
related.

I agree that an economy based on free energy would be much more prosperous
for the world, but it is also about control, not just money. Power is the
ultimate aphrodisiac, as they say.

Anyway, not trying to argue. Thanks for an interesting discussion.

I know that many (99.99%) devices do not work, but it seems that people like Tesla, who was clearly a genius, was able to use these principles for some amazing inventions, which were later suppressed by private interests. If you had a working prototype, do you really think those interests would allow you to build millions of them? You would be quickly bankrupted and discredited, or possibly worse. Such is the fate of people, like Dr. Rife, who cured cancer in the 1920s. Perhaps the politics that I refer to is what prevents these breakthroughs from reaching people like you to begin with. It is an external control system, not the scientist themselves. I don’t mean to label you one way or the other. I know that any community can be very diverse.

I would be interested to get your reaction to the following excerpt. I’m not sure of the original source, but I have heard this more than once. There seems to be a divergence following Maxwell between what is taught in classical physics and what is available to covert interests. Maybe it is all nonsense and conspiracy theory. I don’t really know, but my sense is, there is some truth to it.

“In late 1864, James Clerk Maxwell published his epic material on
electromagnetic waves. His material dealt not only with electrical
and magnetic waves, but also the relativistic/ etherial psycho-active
component of these waves (representing electromagnetics of the second
order and above). The equations also included transformations that
enabled the change from inertial frames of reference to non-inertial
frames of reference. Maxwell’s original equations were written in
Quaternion notation, a complex mathematical system available at that
time before Vector Analysis was introduced by Oliver Heaviside.
Today’s generalized equivalent of Quaternions is Tensors.

In short, Maxwell’s original work gave the necessary information for
gravitational propulsion and psychoactive devices. Someone somewhere
recognized this, for shortly after his death, the mathematician
Oliver Heaviside, the chemist Willard Gibbs, and physicist Heinrich
Hertz decided to “edit” or “interpret” Maxwells famous equations
which were, in the original form, the foundations of electromagnetics
and Unified Field Theory (UFT). This “unholy trio, especially
Heaviside, disregarded the Quaternions or Scalar components of
Maxwells original equations, because they represented potentials and
not fields. He thought potentials were akin to “mysticism”,
because “everybody knows that fields contain mass, and mass cannot be
created from apparently nothing, which is what potentials are, both
literally and mathematically; they are an accumulation or reservoir
of energy. Furthermore, not only did they throw away the
gravitational component with the Quatern- ion/Scalar, but also
postulated that gravitation and electro- magnetism were mutually
exclusive, not interdependent. That was the death blow to subsequent
efforts by scientists to realize a functioning unified field theory.
Because of this one act, electromagnetism was reduced from its
original five dimensions to only four: X, Y, Z, and time. The element
of G was removed.

Because of this deliberate act, twenty-two other errors exist today
in electromagnetic theory. The very concepts of force, mass and
charge are ill-defined, and the so-called “static” electrical charge
has been discovered by Quantum mechanics not to be static at all, but
to move rotationally by virtue of the quantum mechanical spin.
Finally, adding insult to injury, the so-called “imaginary
components” of Maxwells original equations as well as the mutilated
version of the equations have also been discarded or ignored. With
this last error, the door to hyperspacial domains was forever closed,
for the present mathematics and physics of electromagnetic theory do
not allow for hyperspacial domains (domains out- side of three
dimensions), superluminal signals (signals that exceed the speed of
light or are infinite in speed), and a unified field theory.

The edited version of Maxwells work, which every physicist and
engineer has had to contend with, discards electrogravitation, and
avoids the unification of gravitation and electromagnetics. It also
prevents the direct engineering of gravitation, space-time, time flow
rates, free energy devices, and quantum changes, which is viewed by
the altered equations that are vector-based as only a statistical
change. The quaternion approach captures the ability to utilize
electromagnetics and produce local curvature of spacetime. Heaviside
wrote a subset of Maxwell’s equations where this capability is
excluded.

Dr. Henry Monteith has independently discovered that Maxwell’s
original quaternion theory was a unified field theory. Einstein
assumed, because he only had access to the altered equations, that
curving spacetime could only be achieved by the weak gravitational
force due to mass, that the local frame would always be a Lorentz
frame, which would mean that all operations would be constrained to
conservation laws of physics.” In the 1960′s the Hertz (Hz) replaced
Cycles Per Second. Since, then everyone thinks that all
electromagnetic waves are hertzian. Only the upper portion of the
spectrum before Infra- red contains Hertzian waves. ELF and ULF are
not; waves in biosystems and natural phenomena are not Hertzian in
nature.”

Sorry for my sarcasm. I was simply suggesting that no laws of physics
are being broken by so called over unity devices. A dam could be thought
of as over unity if we did not see the water or know where it came
from and it might appear to violate physical laws. Magnetism, gravity,
the zero point field, or whatever else might exist, can be tapped into as
well.
I’m sure there are more hoaxes than not, but it is hard to ignore the
evidence of people like Tesla or Adams. Sometimes it just seems like
the sciences are governed more by politics than a true desire for
exploration and discovery.
We should be examining why these alternate technologies work, not
why they don’t. Just my humble opinion.

Ooh, ooh, I hear there is this new over unity device, called a hydroelectric dam. Where does the energy come from? Some say it is from the water in rivers storing up potential energy at the Dam wall, but I think that is just wishful thinking. How can you get free energy from a Dam? It defies the laws of physics. Won’t the friction in the Dam generators cause it not to work? I’ve never seen this so called “water”, therefore, it must not exist. How can a Dam tap into something that I say does not exist?
Maybe I should get a PhD in physics too.

There is free energy, it’s caled Nature – Sun, Wind and Water and doesn’t look like it will stop for a while

i think that can produce electricity by combination gravity and hydrolic for example inter the tube of a truck if you want to know mail to me.

Have built 2 gravity gen. 1 With Water, 1 with fishing weights. where can i send pic?

Try this…I want someone to attached some tubes at angles (one end closer to the rim) all around the spoke area of a large bicycle wheel or a wheel with better bearings. Inside the tubes go solid steel or glass balls one in each. One end of the steel of hard plastic tube is sealed shut the other blocked with a small spring.

The tubes are also internally lubricated. As the wheel turns the steel balls slide along the angled tubes to be closer to the wheels axil for half the rotation. as they pass at the top or the rotation, gravity pulls on them and they slide down the tube in the direction of the wheel rim untill they hit the solid tube end with a hard thud. The rool back before the ride back to the top is absorbed by the spring dampening and countering some momentum loss.

Because the balls are closer to the rim on the down side and closer to the wheel centre during the ride back to the top, the wheel is always heaver on one side.

This may not be enough to keep it turning due to the friction, so the momentum boost provided by the steel balls hitting the solid tube ends is like a small hammer that strengthens the momentum to keep the wheel turning, provided a human oils it once a week. I don’t have a workshop to build one.
comments to Founder at savetheworldfree.ning.com

if this posibal come in market but we not see in market why

Just like in freshman physics, as long as you ignore friction, it works.
The US patent office banned patent applications for “perpetual motion” machines more than a hundred years ago for a reason-they can’t work.